Another example of utilitarianism in the workplace would be an amoral stance on one's career, in this case. In order for them to get promoted they must sacrifice the time they spend with their family. Sure being mean to your family is morally wrong, but some people really thinks that depriving their family of their time is most useful in terms of furthering their career. I remember one of my family members worked at car factory when I was little; (actually he still works there today). He is always working a lot of long hour’s everyday instead of being at home with his wife and kids.

How does one make a utilitarian-based decision in a case like this?

A person makes a utilitarian decision on which choice (or compromise) gives the most benefit to the most people. S/he must weigh the benefit to the 4 or 5 family members against the benefit to the workers and managers of his work place.

In a case like this, making a utilitarian-based decision involves assessing the potential consequences of sacrificing time with family for career advancement. Utilitarianism is an ethical theory that focuses on maximizing overall well-being or utility, where the right action is the one that produces the greatest amount of happiness or the least amount of suffering for the greatest number of people.

To make a utilitarian-based decision in this scenario, one needs to consider the potential benefits and drawbacks of prioritizing career advancement over spending time with family. Here are some steps you can follow to evaluate the situation from a utilitarian perspective:

1. Identify the stakeholders: Determine who will be affected by the decision. In this case, the family member, their immediate family (such as their spouse and children), and potentially the individual's colleagues and employer are the key stakeholders.

2. Assess the probable consequences: Consider the short-term and long-term consequences of prioritizing career advancement over family time. Will the individual's promotion lead to better financial stability, job satisfaction, or opportunities for their family in the future? On the other hand, what negative effects might arise from neglecting family relationships? Consider the potential emotional strain, impact on the well-being of the family members, and the overall quality of life for everyone involved.

3. Weigh the potential happiness or suffering: Utilitarianism involves quantifying happiness or suffering to determine the overall utility. While it is difficult to assign exact values to such factors, try to estimate the expected happiness gained from career advancement against the potential suffering caused by neglecting family relationships.

4. Consider alternatives: Explore alternative options that might allow for a better balance between career and family. Could the individual negotiate for more flexible work hours or consider different job opportunities with better work-life balance? Assessing these alternatives will help in weighing the potential utility of different choices.

5. Make a decision: Based on the assessment of consequences, weigh the overall utility and choose the course of action that results in the greatest overall well-being for the stakeholders involved. This decision may differ for each individual based on their values, priorities, and specific circumstances.

It is important to remember that utilitarianism does not dictate a specific answer but provides a framework to evaluate the potential consequences and make a decision. The key is to consider the impact on well-being and strive for the greatest overall utility.