Now imagine that you are conducting research on the length of time it takes customers to select items in a grocery store. Assume that your hypothesis is that people will spend more time deciding on more expensive items than on cheaper items.
• What might be the advantages of using naturalistic observation?
• What might be the disadvantages of using naturalistic observation?
http://psychology.about.com/od/nindex/g/naturalistic.htm
I searched Google under the key words "naturalistic observation advantages disadvantages" to get these possible sources:
http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=naturalistic+observation+advantages+disadvantages&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8
In the future, you can find the information you desire more quickly, if you use appropriate key words to do your own search. Also see http://hanlib.sou.edu/searchtools/.
are conducting research on the length of time it takes customers to select items in a grocery store
Advantages of using naturalistic observation in conducting research on the length of time it takes customers to select items in a grocery store include:
1. Real-world setting: Naturalistic observation allows the research to take place in an authentic environment, such as an actual grocery store. This ensures that the behaviors and decisions observed are more likely to reflect real-life situations.
2. Ecological validity: By observing customers' behavior in their natural environment, the research findings are likely to have a high level of ecological validity, meaning that they accurately represent how people behave in real-world situations.
3. In-depth understanding: Naturalistic observation provides an opportunity to gain a deep understanding of the context, factors, and variables that may influence customer decision-making. It allows researchers to observe and record various aspects, such as customer demographics, item price ranges, and other environmental cues, which can contribute to a more nuanced analysis.
4. Unobtrusiveness: In naturalistic observation, researchers typically blend into the environment and observe participants without interrupting or altering their behaviors. This minimizes the potential for observer bias or participant reactivity, leading to more authentic and unbiased data collection.
However, there are also some disadvantages to using naturalistic observation:
1. Lack of control: Unlike laboratory experiments, naturalistic observation does not allow researchers to manipulate variables or control the environment. As a result, it can be challenging to isolate and identify specific factors that influence customer decision-making.
2. Time-consuming: Naturalistic observation requires significant time and effort, as researchers need to spend extensive periods observing and documenting behaviors. This can be particularly challenging if the research setting is dynamic, such as a busy grocery store, where events and behaviors occur rapidly.
3. Limited generalizability: The findings obtained from naturalistic observation may not be easily generalizable to other settings or populations. This is because the observed behaviors and decision-making processes can be influenced by specific contextual factors unique to the observed environment.
4. Ethical considerations: Researchers must ensure they adhere to ethical guidelines, such as obtaining informed consent from participants and maintaining the privacy and confidentiality of the observed individuals. Maintaining ethical standards in naturalistic observation can be more challenging compared to other research methods.
Overall, naturalistic observation offers advantages in terms of ecological validity and in-depth understanding of real-world behaviors. However, it also presents limitations in terms of control, time-consuming nature, limited generalizability, and ethical considerations. Researchers should carefully consider these factors when deciding to use naturalistic observation in their study.