Im doing an essay and this is the format for it.
Intro of 5 or more sentences, where you introduce your thesis statement(that which you will be writing about - in the form of a statement, or point of view)
Two or three paragraphs, of about 8-10 sentences each, where you support that which you are saying with examples, and or reasons.
(body of essay)
Concluding paragraph of five or more sentences where you have proven your point of view.
There were two topics that I could choose from, and I chose this one...
Discuss three pros(for) and three cons(against) concerning Confederation. What was happening at this time? How did the final outcome of the Dominion of Canada come into reality? Which people were important at this time, and what strategies did they use - for and against?
I have never done a thesis statement before, this is what I have done so far.
Confederation wasn't as simple as it seemed; it came about with a lot of arguments. Some opposed the decision of Confederation and some wanted it to set right away.
Is this a better instead:
[Uniting the different parts of Canada wasn’t as easy as it seemed. It took lots of planning and negotiation. Everyone had different opinions; some opposed and some agreed about the idea of Confederation. It wasn’t easy to come up with an agreement. The people who worked together to unite Canada had a hard job.]
Three Pros concerning Confederation were that a strong central government could be developed and then all the members of that government could share their ideas which would lead to the growth of the entire country. The railink would bring happiness to all of the provinces, and Halifax would become the centre port of trade. The country overall would become important and it wouldn't have to be dependent upon any other country. All could benefit from the union of the colonies. The three cons were that if Confederation ws to take place, than the Maritime provinces wouldn't be able to maintain their ties with Britain. Also, the French and English would have a tough time getting along. They are a separate nation, and could never become one. The Maritime provinces could grow strong and independent on their own. At this time, Conferences were being held. There was the Charlottetown Conference, Quebec Conference, and the London Conference. Everyone was sharing their ideas on what should be done, and if Confederation should take place.
How did the final outcome of the Dominion of Canada come into reality( I don't understand what it means...
People who held importance during this time were the leaders from the colonies, as they participated in the Confederation conferences. They were known as the “Fathers” of Confederation. All individuals who went to the conferences played an important role, because their opinions mattered. They tried to gather people on their side to either oppose or support confederation.
Conclusion:
Confederation was fairly taken place. Many opposers did not want a central government to be built, and it never did get built. The whole nation became a federation. The colonies had been united.
Your thesis statement is a good start, but it can be improved to provide a clearer focus for your essay. Here's an improved version:
"The process of Confederation in Canada was a complex endeavor that involved passionate debates and differing opinions. Despite opposition and challenges, the idea of Confederation emerged as a solution to unite the colonies. This essay will explore three pros and three cons of Confederation, shed light on the significant events and conferences that shaped the final outcome of the Dominion of Canada, and highlight the key individuals who were instrumental in advocating for or against Confederation."
Now let's take a look at your body paragraphs. It's essential to provide specific examples or reasons to support your points effectively. Here are some suggestions to improve the content of your paragraphs:
1st Body Paragraph - Pros of Confederation:
- One pro of Confederation was the potential for the development of a strong central government. This would allow for effective decision-making and the sharing of ideas from different regions, ultimately leading to the growth and progress of the entire country. You can provide examples of specific policies or initiatives that demonstrated this benefit.
- Another pro was the promise of a transcontinental railway, which would connect the provinces and facilitate trade and transportation. This would lead to economic growth, with Halifax emerging as a significant center port of trade.
- Confederation offered self-reliance for the new nation, without depending on other countries. It provided an opportunity for the colonies to assert their independence and build a prominent position on the global stage. Mention specific ways in which the colonies could benefit from the union.
2nd Body Paragraph - Cons of Confederation:
- One of the cons of Confederation was the concern that the Maritime provinces would lose their ties with Britain. Explain why some individuals saw this loss as a disadvantage and the potential consequences it could have had.
- The challenge of maintaining harmony between English and French-speaking populations was another con. Elaborate on the cultural and linguistic differences that existed and why some believed that these differences would hinder unity.
- Some argued that the Maritime provinces had the potential to grow strong and independent on their own, without the need for Confederation. Provide examples or reasons that substantiate this perspective.
Now, let's address your question about the final outcome of the Dominion of Canada. The Dominion of Canada referred to the federal union that emerged after the Confederation process. You can explain that the final outcome of the Dominion of Canada came into reality through a series of conferences and negotiations.
- The Charlottetown Conference, held in 1864, served as the initial platform for discussing the idea of Confederation. It brought together representatives from the provinces, who shared their visions and concerns.
- The Quebec Conference, held later in 1864, was crucial in shaping the final framework for Confederation. It resulted in the creation of the 72 Resolutions, which laid out the fundamental principles and structure of the proposed federal union.
- Finally, the London Conference in 1867 brought together delegates from Canada and Britain to finalize the terms and details of Confederation. The British North America Act was passed, granting Canada the status of a Dominion within the British Empire.
In your conclusion, you can summarize the main points you have discussed. Here's an example:
"In conclusion, Confederation in Canada was a complex process that faced opposition and challenges. Despite this, the desire to unite the colonies prevailed and resulted in the creation of the Dominion of Canada. The pros of Confederation included the potential for a strong central government, the establishment of a transcontinental railway, and the opportunity for self-reliance. On the other hand, concerns were raised regarding the loss of ties with Britain, the challenges of English-French coexistence, and the potential independence of the Maritime provinces. Significant conferences such as Charlottetown, Quebec, and London played a vital role in shaping the final outcome of Confederation. The "Fathers" of Confederation, along with other influential individuals, played a crucial role in advocating for or against Confederation. Ultimately, through compromise and negotiation, the colonies embraced unity, leading to the birth of the Dominion of Canada."