Has anyone read the story The Sniper, the sniper ends up killing his own brother at the end. One question I don't get is that how do I justify the use of irony and suspense in this story?
To justify the use of irony and suspense in "The Sniper," it's important to first understand what these literary techniques are and how they are employed in the story. Irony is a contrast or incongruity between expectations and reality, while suspense is the feeling of uncertainty or anticipation about what will happen next.
To analyze the use of irony in "The Sniper," you can start by examining the events and outcomes that are unexpected or contrary to what the reader might initially assume. In this story, the most significant irony lies in the fact that the sniper ultimately kills his own brother. This reveals the tragic consequences of war and highlights the randomness and indiscriminate nature of violence. The irony here lies in the fact that the sniper unknowingly targets his own flesh and blood, emphasizing the senselessness and tragedy of war.
To justify the use of suspense in the story, you can examine how the author builds tension and keeps the reader engaged. Throughout the narrative, the writer employs various techniques to create suspense. For example, the sniper's strategic positioning on the rooftop, his intense focus, and the suspenseful waiting for the enemy sniper to make a mistake all contribute to a heightened sense of anticipation. Additionally, the description of the sniper's internal conflict, as he hesitates before shooting his foe, further intensifies the suspense. The author uses this technique to keep the reader on edge, creating a sense of uncertainty and interest in the outcome of the story.
By discussing these particular instances of irony and suspense in "The Sniper," you can justify their use and demonstrate how they enrich the story, add depth to the characters, and contribute to the overall themes and messages conveyed by the author.