Considering militry Keynesianism and the politics that are involved in military base closures, discuss the efficiency of the decision making process (not the end result) that is used when Congress considers closing military bases. Be sure to include basic economic principles that came into play when Ft. Carson in colorado Springs and other bases came under consideration.

I would think that closing some military bases, and moving such operations to other bases, improves the overall efficiency of government spending on military. (Takes advantage of economies of scale, etc.) However closing a base can clobber the local economy.

How would it effect the economy though? Would the actual process (not the end result) be efficent?

The decision-making process involved in closing military bases, particularly when considered by Congress, is complex and influenced by various political and economic factors. To assess the efficiency of this process, it is important to consider the basic economic principles at play, such as the concept of military Keynesianism.

1. Military Keynesianism: Military Keynesianism is an economic theory that suggests government spending on the military has the potential to stimulate economic growth. According to this theory, military expenditures create jobs, stimulate demand in local economies, and have a multiplier effect that ripples through other industries. Therefore, decisions regarding closing military bases need to take into account the potential economic impact on surrounding communities.

2. Cost-Benefit Analysis: One of the fundamental economic tools used when considering military base closures is cost-benefit analysis. This analysis examines the economic costs and benefits associated with keeping a particular base operational. Factors considered may include maintenance costs, operational expenses, potential savings, and the possibility of reallocating resources to more productive areas.

3. Job Creation vs. Efficiency: When Congress considers closing military bases, they often face a trade-off between job creation and efficiency. Military bases are significant employers, and closing them can have adverse effects on local economies, such as job losses and reduced tax revenues. On the other hand, maintaining inefficient bases that are no longer strategically necessary can divert resources from more productive uses.

4. Political Considerations: The decision-making process for military base closures is also heavily influenced by political factors. Local representatives advocating for military bases in their districts may put pressure on Congress to keep the bases open to protect jobs and the local economy. Political negotiations and compromises can significantly shape the final decisions regarding base closures.

Considering the efficiency of the decision-making process is subjective, as it depends on the desired outcome and the perspective of different stakeholders. Some might argue that the process is efficient because it carefully examines the costs and benefits of each base and weighs economic factors against strategic military needs. Others might argue that political considerations often overshadow economic efficiency, leading to suboptimal decisions.

Specifically regarding Fort Carson in Colorado Springs or other bases, a thorough analysis would require considering the local economic impact, the necessity of the base in terms of military strategy, potential savings, and the potential for reallocation of resources to more essential areas. Additionally, Congressional debates, political lobbying, and compromises play important roles in shaping the final decisions.

In conclusion, the decision-making process for closing military bases involves a complex interplay of economic principles, such as military Keynesianism and cost-benefit analysis, along with political considerations. The assessment of efficiency in this process is subjective and can vary based on different perspectives and desired outcomes.