The passage implies that Plessey vs. Ferguson.
1. called for intergration.
2. stated that separtated facilities wer unequal.
3. was based on out bounded psychology.
4. was constitutional
5. applied only to private schools.
To determine which option is implied by the passage, we need to analyze the information provided.
Plessy v. Ferguson was a landmark United States Supreme Court case decided in 1896. The case dealt with the constitutionality of racial segregation laws. The key argument in the case was whether the "separate but equal" doctrine, which allowed for racial segregation in public facilities, was constitutional.
According to the passage, Plessy v. Ferguson was a case that is being discussed. Now let's take a closer look at the options:
1. The passage does not mention anything about Plessy v. Ferguson calling for integration, so this option cannot be implied by the passage.
2. The passage does mention that the case dealt with the issue of whether separate facilities were equal or not. This implies that Plessy v. Ferguson stated that separated facilities were unequal.
3. The passage does not provide any information about the psychology behind the case, so this option is not implied by the passage.
4. The passage does mention that Plessy v. Ferguson dealt with the constitutionality of racial segregation laws. However, it does not explicitly mention whether the case was constitutional or not. Therefore, this option is not implied by the passage.
5. The passage does not specify whether Plessy v. Ferguson applied only to private schools or not. Thus, this option is not implied by the passage.
Based on our analysis, the implied option from the passage is:
2. stated that separated facilities were unequal.