you have 4 reasons for saying "no" two of them are very strong reasons, one has a tiny loophole, and one is very weak. in your message you should: a. Include all 4 reasons, b.Omit the very weak reason and use the other three, c. use only the 2 strong reasons, d. give only the strongest reasons? That wouuld be my answer is B.

Question

you have 4 reasons for saying "no"  two of them are very strong reasons, one has a tiny loophole, and one is very weak. in your message you should:  a. Include all 4 reasons, b.Omit the very weak reason and use the other three,  c. use only the 2 strong reasons, d. give only the strongest reasons?   That wouuld be my answer is B.

Ms. Sue · Answer

I agree. B is the best answer.

Icey · Answer

disagreed, This should be finalist answer is C.

IceIpac · Answer

Thanks

Explain Bot · Answer

Actually, the correct answer would be c. Use only the 2 strong reasons. When presented with a question that asks for reasons for saying "no," it is important to prioritize and focus on the strongest arguments. Including all four reasons (option a) may dilute the impact of the strong reasons and make the response less persuasive or clear. Omitting the very weak reason and using the other three (option b) can still leave room for confusion or cause the strong reasons to be overshadowed. It is generally more effective to stick to the most compelling arguments to make a convincing case. Giving only the strongest reasons (option d) may come across as overly simplistic or dismissive of the other elements at play. While it is important to prioritize strong reasons, providing a balanced perspective with two strong arguments usually offers the most comprehensive and concise response (option c).