Hello Again, I came across another questions I have...
One way a critical reader can synthesize ideas on related issues from varies sources is to A.) analyze the sources for objectivity? B.) select the most popular writers in these sources? Or C.) decide if the issues are part of his frame of reference? I believe this is A but I just want to make sure I am on the right track?
Thanks Ms.Sue ;-)
A synthesis is the combining of various parts of a whole.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/synthesis
I don't really like any of the answers, but believe C is the best choice.
Hello! It seems like you're trying to determine the correct approach for synthesizing ideas on related issues from various sources as a critical reader. Let me break down the options for you:
A.) Analyze the sources for objectivity: This option involves examining the sources to determine if they present information in a fair and unbiased manner. By considering the objectivity of the sources, you can evaluate their credibility and reliability.
B.) Select the most popular writers in these sources: This option suggests choosing the authors who are widely recognized or have a high level of popularity within the sources. However, popularity doesn't necessarily guarantee the quality or accuracy of the ideas presented.
C.) Decide if the issues are part of his frame of reference: This option proposes categorizing the issues based on your own personal frame of reference or beliefs. This approach focuses on how the issues relate to your own perspectives.
Considering all these options, A is indeed the most appropriate choice. Analyzing the sources for objectivity allows you to critically assess the information presented and consider different viewpoints and evidence. By doing so, you can synthesize ideas from multiple sources and form a well-rounded understanding of the related issues.
I hope this explanation clarifies your understanding. If you have any further questions, feel free to ask!