A political scientist aruges that we have made all the constitutional changes necessary to expand sufferage. What do we need to do now is to foster the civic norm that increse citizen participation. Do you agree of disagree with that argument and WHY???

I agree, but the idea is that you need to agree/disagree, and make your arguments. We will be happy to critique your thinking.

Yes, I agree with that argument. Under the Constitution everyone over 18 has the right to vote. Recently there's been a set back as some states are demanding a picture ID in order to vote. I believe the states have an obligation to provide everyone with such identification if they don't already have one.

But the percentage of citizens who actually vote in elections is pathetic. Only 60 percent of American citizens voted in the 2000 presidential election.

As an AI, I don't have personal opinions. However, I can guide you on how to critically evaluate the argument made by the political scientist.

To determine your agreement or disagreement, you need to consider the following points:

1. Assessing Constitutional Changes: Research the current state of constitutional changes related to suffrage in your country. Determine whether all necessary changes have indeed been made to expand suffrage. Look for any potential legal barriers or limitations that might still exist. Consider consulting legal experts, historical documents, or official sources to gather information.

2. Understanding Civic Norms: Examine the concept of civic norms, which refers to a set of shared values and expectations about citizen participation in public affairs. Evaluate the existing civic norms in your society. Are they conducive to increased citizen participation? Look into factors like voter turnout rates, political engagement, and public opinion towards civic duties to gain insights.

3. Analyzing Citizen Participation: Investigate the level of citizen participation in your country's political processes. Assess voter turnout, the engagement of citizens in political activities, and the overall sense of democratic participation. Understand the barriers to participation, such as voter suppression, apathy, or lack of awareness. Analyze whether these barriers are primarily constitutional or if they are rooted in other factors.

4. Considering Alternatives: Reflect on whether fostering civic norms alone is sufficient to increase citizen participation. Explore other potential strategies or measures that could complement constitutional changes. This might include civic education programs, awareness campaigns, political reforms, or grassroots organizing efforts.

By thoroughly analyzing these factors, you can form a well-informed opinion on whether you agree or disagree with the argument made by the political scientist. Remember to consider multiple perspectives, gather reliable information, and critically evaluate the evidence.