For Alexander Hamilton v. Thomas Jefferson was the conflict about the Presidency, and Hamilton's and Jefferson's plans?
Like Loose v. Strict Constitution?
You're on the right track.
Study this article for more insight.
http://countrystudies.us/united-states/history-41.htm
Yes, the conflict between Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson can be characterized as revolving around their contrasting views on the powers of the federal government and their interpretations of the Constitution. This difference in perspective stemmed from their political ideologies and their roles in shaping the early American government.
Alexander Hamilton, as Secretary of the Treasury, advocated for a strong central government and an expansive interpretation of the Constitution. He believed in a loose construction of the Constitution, arguing that the federal government possessed implied powers to carry out its responsibilities, such as the power to establish a national bank. Hamilton's vision involved a robust federal government that promoted economic development through industrialization, commerce, and financial systems tied to wealthy elites.
On the other hand, Thomas Jefferson, as Secretary of State, championed a more limited role for the federal government and a strict interpretation of the Constitution. He believed in states' rights and feared that a powerful federal government would concentrate power, leading to potential tyranny. Jefferson envisioned an agrarian society with an economy centered around small, independent farmers. He emphasized the importance of individual liberties and believed that the federal government should have minimal involvement in citizens' lives.
The conflict between Hamilton and Jefferson extended beyond their ideological differences. It also encompassed their competing economic plans and visions for the future of the United States. Hamilton proposed policies such as government assumption of state debts, establishment of a national bank, and promotion of manufacturing and trade. Conversely, Jefferson favored agrarianism, supporting the interests of farmers and rural communities over industry and commerce.
Ultimately, the tensions between Hamilton and Jefferson sparked a larger debate over the interpretation of the Constitution, the role of the federal government, and the nature of American society. This conflict between loose and strict interpretations of the Constitution became emblematic of the broader divisions that emerged during the early years of the United States.