precedent,while not an absolute constraint on the courts ,is needed to
a)maintain legal consistency over time,so the confusion and uncertainty about the law can be avoided
b) preserve the courts as a majoritarian institution
c)check the president in the area of public law
d)balance the policy-making authority of Congress
IS A CORRECT ANSWER/THANK YOU:))))
Right! :-)
THANK YOU :))))
You're welcome.
i believe that a would be the correct answere due to so there would not be confusion in the law and questions can be avioded in understanding the law.
the judicary's satus as an iindependent branch of the national government rests on the judicial review which grants the judiciary the authority
Yes, option (a) is the correct answer. Precedent is needed to maintain legal consistency over time, ensuring that there is clarity and stability in the interpretation and application of the law. This helps to avoid confusion and uncertainty in legal matters.
To arrive at this answer, you can break down each option and analyze its relevance to the role of precedent:
a) "Maintain legal consistency over time, so confusion and uncertainty about the law can be avoided": This option directly addresses the purpose of precedent, which is to establish a consistent and predictable body of law. By following previous court decisions, future courts can avoid confusion and uncertainty by relying on established legal principles.
b) "Preserve the courts as a majoritarian institution": This option does not relate directly to the function of precedent. Precedent is not about preserving the courts as a democratic institution; rather, it is about maintaining legal consistency.
c) "Check the president in the area of public law": This option is not directly related to precedent. It seems to be discussing checks and balances in the branch of government responsible for public law, which is not specific to the role of precedent.
d) "Balance the policy-making authority of Congress": This option is also not directly related to the role of precedent. It focuses on the balance of power between the courts and Congress in terms of policy-making authority, which is a separate matter from precedent.
By analyzing the options, we can see that option (a) aligns most closely with the purpose of precedent in maintaining legal consistency and avoiding confusion and uncertainty in the law.