How does the author of the article "A NAtion Apart" organize information to build his argument does he include any counterarguments?
Please read many of our previous answers about this article.
http://www.jiskha.com/search/index.cgi?query=%22A+Nation+Apart%22
To analyze how the author of the article "A Nation Apart" organizes information and builds their argument, we can follow a few steps. Please note that as an AI text-based model, I don't have access to specific articles or their content. However, I can provide you with a general understanding of how authors typically organize information and include counterarguments in their arguments:
1. Introduction: The author usually introduces the topic or issue they will discuss. They may provide some context, background information, or state their thesis statement, which is the main argument they will be making throughout the article.
2. Body paragraphs: The author will present the main points that support their argument in separate paragraphs. They may use a variety of organizational structures, such as:
a. Chronological order: The author presents information in a time-based sequence, focusing on historical events or developments leading to their argument.
b. Cause and effect: The author explains the causes and their corresponding effects related to the issue under discussion, demonstrating how they contribute to their argument.
c. Compare and contrast: The author highlights similarities and differences between different aspects of the issue, supporting their argument by emphasizing these comparisons.
d. Problem-solution: The author identifies a problem, analyzes its underlying causes, and proposes solutions that align with their argument.
3. Counterarguments: To make their argument more persuasive, authors often address counterarguments to acknowledge differing perspectives or potential objections. They may present opposing viewpoints or bring up alternative explanations or evidence.
a. Refutation: After presenting counterarguments, the author refutes or discredits them by providing evidence, pointing out flaws, or offering a more convincing perspective.
b. Rebuttal: Authors may directly respond to counterarguments by acknowledging their validity but demonstrating why their own argument remains stronger or more reasonable.
4. Conclusion: The author summarizes their main points and reiterates their thesis statement, leaving the reader with a conclusive understanding of the argument presented.
By following these organizational strategies, authors can effectively structure their arguments and provide a coherent line of reasoning while addressing counterarguments to bolster their position. It's important to consider that different authors may employ variations in their approach, so it's always helpful to analyze specific articles in their entirety to fully understand their organization and inclusion of counterarguments.