You are writing to a reader who favors a different solution than the one you recommend. Which of the following is MOST likely to persuade the reader?
Describe your reader's solution first, explain why it won't work, and then go on to describe your own solution.
Ignore your opponent's solution and just concentrate on your own.
Describe your own solution first. Then briefly say why your reader's idea won't work.
Go back and forth between solutions, contrasting step by step.
I choose B. Anyone agree?
Either B or D.
Psychologically, it is better to state the positives of the solution (assuming that you can find some), before you state the problems you see and give your solution(s).
Which alternative does this match most closely?
To persuade a reader who favors a different solution than the one you recommend, the most effective approach is to go back and forth between solutions, contrasting step by step. This method allows you to present a fair and clear comparison between both solutions, enabling the reader to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of each.
By presenting your own solution first, you establish your main argument and demonstrate confidence in your recommendation. This approach allows you to highlight the advantages and benefits of your solution without immediately dismissing the reader's preferred option.
Next, you should address the reader's solution and provide a thorough explanation of why it might not be as effective as your proposal. By being respectful and logical in your analysis, you can demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of the reader's perspective and concerns.
Going back and forth between solutions allows you to create a balanced argument. It allows the reader to see a direct comparison between the two options, making it easier for them to assess the strengths and weaknesses of each approach. This method is more likely to persuade the reader because it demonstrates your willingness to engage with their viewpoint while also presenting a well-supported alternative solution.