How did the method Democritus(anicent Greek scientist) use to reach his conclusions for purposing a particle theory differ from modern scientific method???
Read:
(Broken Link Removed)
Then read:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democritus
Now ask yourself how different those Greek philosophers arrived at their conclusions.
he didn't do experiments
because they did ok lady!!!
because they did ok lady!!!
Democritus, an ancient Greek scientist, proposed a particle theory to explain the nature of matter. The method he used to reach his conclusions differed significantly from the modern scientific method.
Firstly, Democritus did not conduct experiments to support his ideas. Instead, he relied on philosophical reasoning and logical argumentation. He used observation and deduction to speculate on the existence of atoms, which he believed were indivisible and indestructible particles that make up all matter.
In contrast, the modern scientific method places a strong emphasis on experimentation and empirical evidence. Today, scientists formulate hypotheses based on observations and prior knowledge, and then conduct experiments to test those hypotheses. Through these experiments, scientists gather data and analyze it objectively to draw conclusions. This empirical approach helps to ensure that scientific findings are reliable, accurate, and can be replicated by other scientists.
Furthermore, the modern scientific method relies on peer review and publication of research findings, allowing other scientists to scrutinize and validate the results. This process helps to ensure the integrity of scientific knowledge and encourages collaboration and further investigations.
In summary, while Democritus used philosophical reasoning and deduction to propose his particle theory, the modern scientific method incorporates experimentation, empirical evidence, peer review, and collaboration to reach conclusions about the natural world.