Can someone help me with this question?
A) With the emergence of urban cities came the need for a distinct city government, including the role of the boss.
B) What were the positives and negatives of having a boss in the city government?
C)Do you think the boss and the political machine are similar to current local systems of government Why?
All I want to know where on the internet can I find these? What do they mean by "having a boss in the city government?" Are they saying people who are in the mobs? I don't get this!!!
Why is history weird?!
Having a boss in city government, means that the person you work for also is a member of the city council or has some position in the city government. NO, they are not talking about mobs.
The are asking what help or hindrance would having your boss work for city govt. be.
A city "boss" is likely to be mayor of a large city who is reelected for many, many years. You may have read about Boss Tweed. In Chicago, Mayor Daley acted as "boss" for many years.
Read this site for information about political machines and bosses.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_machine
You can find information related to these questions on various websites such as academic databases, online encyclopedias, or reputable historical sources. Some examples include JSTOR, Britannica, or the websites of reputable universities or museums.
In the context of the question, "having a boss in the city government" refers to the system of political machines that emerged in urban cities during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. These political machines were characterized by a hierarchical structure where a political boss held significant power and influence over the local government.
To understand the positives and negatives of having a boss in the city government, it is helpful to consider some historical perspectives. The boss system provided a level of stability and structured governance in rapidly growing urban areas. The boss could efficiently allocate resources and provide patronage, such as jobs or social services, to constituents. However, this system also led to corruption and the abuse of power. Some bosses exploited their position for personal gain or engaged in unethical practices, such as voter manipulation or bribery.
Regarding the comparison to current local systems of government, it would depend on the specific context and the local government structure being referred to. While some aspects of the boss system, such as patronage or corruption, may still exist in certain cases, it is important to consider that contemporary local systems of government are diverse and can significantly vary from place to place.
Remember, history might seem weird or complex at times because it involves understanding different perspectives, analyzing historical events and their consequences, and interpreting the motivations and actions of individuals and societies. It is a field that requires critical thinking and deeper exploration to gain a comprehensive understanding.