Is the following passage valid/sound/strong arguments and what is the reasoning?

If you want to see the best version of the three muskateers, try the 1948 version. Lana Turner is luscious, Vincent Price is dastardly; Angela Lansbury is exquisitely regal; and nobody ever has or ever will portray D'Artagnan with the grace, althleticism, or skill of Gene Kelly. Rent it, it's a must.

The passage you provided does not present a valid, sound, or strong argument as it lacks logical reasoning or evidence to support its claims.

To determine whether an argument is valid, sound, or strong, we need to evaluate the structure and content of the argument. Let's break it down:

1. Claim: "If you want to see the best version of the Three Musketeers, try the 1948 version."
Reasoning: No specific reasoning or evidence is given to support this claim.

2. Claims:
- "Lana Turner is luscious."
- "Vincent Price is dastardly."
- "Angela Lansbury is exquisitely regal."
- "Nobody ever has or ever will portray D'Artagnan with the grace, athleticism, or skill of Gene Kelly."
Reasoning: No logical reasoning or evidence is provided for any of these claims. They are merely subjective opinions.

3. Conclusion: "Rent it, it's a must."
Reasoning: The conclusion is not supported by any logical reasoning or evidence presented in the passage.

In summary, the passage lacks valid reasoning and objective evidence to support its claims. It mainly consists of personal opinions without logical connections or factual support. When evaluating an argument, it is important to provide logical reasoning and evidence to support your claims.