Susan Moller Okin argued against the theories of Rawls, Nozick, MacIntyre and others. Why? Anyone?
i tried that can you be alittle more specific thanks trudy.
http://www.jiskha.com/display.cgi?id=1269787785
Susan Moller Okin argued against the theories of Rawls, Nozick, MacIntyre, and others primarily because she believed that these theories did not adequately address or incorporate gender justice and the oppression faced by women in society. Okin criticized these philosophers for their failure to include gender as a central category of analysis in their theories of justice and ethics.
To explore Okin's arguments in more detail, you can start by reading her influential book, "Justice, Gender, and the Family," where she critically examines the works of Rawls, Nozick, and MacIntyre. In this book, Okin argues that traditional conceptions of justice neglect the needs and experiences of women, leading to the perpetuation of gender inequality and the subjugation of women.
Additionally, Okin objects to the way these theories focus on society's basic structure, disregarding the private sphere of the family and gender-based divisions of labor. She argues that the family is a crucial site of socialization and power dynamics, and any theory of justice must address its impact on gender equality.
Okin's critique encourages a more inclusive understanding of justice that incorporates gender and emphasizes the need for feminist perspectives within political philosophy. To fully grasp her arguments, it is recommended to read her original works and engage with the broader discourse on gender justice within political philosophy.