"Investors and their wives" is considered sexiest because:
a)investors may be female
b)not all investors are married
c)"investors" refers only to woman
d)business document should not mention people's lives outside work
I doubt between A and B?Can you help me,THANKS:)))
Why would it be sexist if an investor wasn't married?
Do you mean "sexist" rather than "sexiest"? If so, I would go with A. To be less sexist, it would be better to say, "investors and their spouses."
YES,I made a mistake in writing "SEXIST"
Of the given options, both option A ("investors may be female") and option B ("not all investors are married") are potential reasons why the phrase "Investors and their wives" might be considered sexist. However, to determine the correct answer, we need to consider the context and the intention behind the phrase.
To analyze this situation, we can look at the phrase itself. The phrase "Investors and their wives" implies a focus on the spouses of investors, assuming heteronormative relationships. This can reinforce traditional gender roles and stereotypes, where the investor (presumed to be male) is seen as the primary breadwinner, while the wife is relegated to a supporting role.
Now let's consider the options:
a) "Investors may be female": This option highlights the inclusivity factor, suggesting that not all investors are male. While this is true and important to consider, it does not address the potential sexist connotation of the phrase itself.
b) "Not all investors are married": This option acknowledges that not all investors are married, which challenges the assumption that an investor would have a wife. This challenges the heteronormative bias of the phrase and could be seen as a potential reason for the sexism.
c) "Investors" refers only to women: This option is incorrect since "investors" is a gender-neutral term and can apply to both men and women. The phrasing of the question suggests a misconception.
d) "Business documents should not mention people's lives outside work": This option is not directly related to the sexist nature of the phrase. It focuses on privacy concerns, but it does not address the potential harm caused by reinforcing gender roles and stereotypes.
Considering the analysis above, option B is the more accurate answer as it challenges the assumption of marriage and highlights the potential sexism associated with the phrase. Keep in mind that the interpretation of what is considered sexist can vary among individuals, and the intention behind the phrase plays an important role in determining whether it is sexist or not.