what is the premises and the conclusion of this argument?
since it is the very nature of terrorism not only to cause immediatw damage but also to strike fear in the hearts of the population under attack, on might say that the terrorists were extraordinary successful.
The two premises seem to be named in the first clause of the sentence, and the conclusion is in the main clause. List them:
Premise 1 =
Premise 2 =
Conclusion =
What do YOU THINK?
To identify the premises and conclusion of the argument, we need to analyze the information presented. Here's a breakdown:
Premise 1: "It is the very nature of terrorism not only to cause immediate damage but also to strike fear in the hearts of the population under attack."
Premise 2: "One might say that the terrorists were extraordinarily successful."
Conclusion: "The terrorists were extraordinarily successful."
The premises in this argument are the statements that support the conclusion. Premise 1 explains the nature of terrorism, emphasizing its goal of causing immediate damage and instilling fear. Premise 2 states that one could consider the terrorists extraordinarily successful. Based on these premises, the conclusion is drawn that the terrorists were indeed very successful.