please explain : “Science gives an intellectual view of reality, and the arts try to make the emotions as precise and disciplined as sciences do the intellect. But of course it’s nonsense to think of the scientist as a cold, unemotional reasoner and the artist as somebody who’s in a perpetual emotional tizzy. You can’t distinguish the arts from the sciences by the mental processes the people in them use: they both operate on a mixture of hunch and common sense. A highly developed science and a highly developed art are very close together, psychologically and otherwise.”

Question

please explain : “Science gives an intellectual view of reality, and the arts try to make the emotions as precise and disciplined as sciences do the intellect. But of course it’s nonsense to think of the scientist as a cold, unemotional reasoner and the artist as somebody who’s in a perpetual emotional tizzy. You can’t distinguish the arts from the sciences by the mental processes the people in them use: they both operate on a mixture of hunch and common sense. A highly developed science and a highly developed art are very close together, psychologically and otherwise.”

Answer 1

Scientists and artists are very close to each other psychologically and otherwise.

Answer 2

Sammi, this paragraph has been explained to you 5 times in the last couple of days.

http://www.jiskha.com/members/profile/posts.cgi?name=sammi

Please do not continue posting the same question. If you do, you will be banned from posting on this forum.

Answer 3

The quote you provided highlights the connection between science and art by emphasizing the similarities in their approaches. It suggests that while science provides an intellectual understanding of reality, the arts aim to express and convey emotions with the same level of precision and discipline that science applies to the intellect.

However, it also cautions against the notion of scientists being solely rational and emotionless, while artists are portrayed as constantly overwhelmed by their emotions. This notion is seen as incorrect, as both scientists and artists utilize a combination of intuition (hunch) and practical judgment (common sense) in their respective fields. In other words, both scientists and artists rely on a blend of logical reasoning and intuitive insights.

The quote further asserts that the distinction between the arts and sciences cannot be determined solely by the cognitive processes used by individuals in those fields. Rather, both domains share psychological and other similarities. This implies that a highly advanced science and a highly developed art can be closely aligned in terms of their psychological processes and other aspects.

In summary, the quote emphasizes the parallel nature of science and art, claiming that they both involve a blending of intellectual and emotional elements. It challenges the widely held stereotypes that portray scientists as purely rational and artists as purely emotional, and suggests that science and art are, in fact, closely related disciplines.