I forgot to include the following statements.

1) Use the simple past when reporting historical events and the simple present when referring to the main events in a plot.
2) The fact that Hamlet refers to himself using adjectives such as dullo pigeon-livered is symbolic of his lack of self confidence (OR These adjectives are symbolic of his lack of ...?)
3) You referred to question number 4 when answering question number 1. Your paragraph is off the suject (or you wandered off the subject?)
4) Express yourself in your own words next time and do not cheat.
5) As I caught you cheating during the exam, I won't evaluate your paragraph at all. As a matter of fact, there is no attempt at expressing your ideas in a personal way (?)(at making your personal remarks on the subject??)
6) Hamlet wonders whether he had been a coward (and not has been) when he had the opportunity of killing Claudius but didn't take it.
7) When using an adjective in a paragraph, you don't have to rephrase its meaning in brackets.
8) An act made (or committed) in the name of freedom?
9) Never write things in brackets in your paragraph.
10) Why didn't you explain the meaning of "he had no gall in his liver"?

Get rid of all in parentheses except in #8.

1 is OK

2 -- get rid of "the fact that" -- http://grammar.ccc.commnet.edu/grammar/concise.htm

5 -- change "As" to "Because"

8 -- "committed" is the correct word; also -- this is not a complete sentence. There is no predicate.

To address the additional statements:

1) The statement is about using verb tenses in writing. When reporting historical events, such as events that have already happened in the past, the simple past tense is used. For example, "The battle started in 1776." However, when referring to the main events in a plot, such as in a novel or play, the simple present tense is used. For example, "In the story, the protagonist faces many challenges."

2) The sentence discusses the symbolism of Hamlet's use of adjectives like "dull" and "pigeon-livered" to describe himself. Is it symbolic of his lack of self-confidence? Yes, it can be interpreted that way. Alternatively, you can rephrase the sentence as "These adjectives symbolize his lack of self-confidence."

3) The statement addresses a mistake made by someone who answered question number 1 but referred to question number 4. The sentence suggests that the paragraph provided is off-topic or not related to the subject. You can choose to say "Your paragraph is off-topic" or "Your paragraph wanders off the subject."

4) This statement advises against cheating and encourages expressing oneself in one's own words. It suggests that instead of attempting to cheat, one should answer using their own thoughts and ideas.

5) The statement is a comment about catching someone cheating during an exam and the consequence of not evaluating their paragraph. It questions whether the person made any effort to express their ideas in a personal way or provide personal remarks on the subject.

6) The sentence describes Hamlet's contemplation of his past actions. Instead of saying "has been," it suggests using "had been" to express an action that occurred before a specific point in the past. In this case, Hamlet wonders about his bravery in the past when he had the opportunity to kill Claudius but didn't take it.

7) The statement provides a general rule when using adjectives in a paragraph. When you use an adjective in a sentence, you don't need to rephrase its meaning in brackets. Just use the adjective to describe the noun clearly.

8) The sentence poses a question about an act committed or done in the name of freedom. You can choose to use "made" or "committed" interchangeably in the sentence.

9) The statement advises against using parentheses (brackets) in your paragraph. It suggests avoiding writing additional information or explanations in brackets within the main body of your writing.

10) The question is about the meaning of the phrase "he had no gall in his liver." Unfortunately, without additional context, it is challenging to determine the exact meaning. It could be an idiom or expression specific to a particular text or author. To better understand its meaning, you may need to provide more information or refer to the specific text or source where it appears.