#49. It has been said that Eastern Europe is a political region more than a physical region. Would you agree or disagree with this statement? You must provide a solid argument for your position.
hmm...I agree that Eastern Europe is not so much a distinct physical region as it is a political one, but i'm not sure how i can support that.
..
'For decades after WWII it formed a buffer between the West and the Communist superpower, the Soviet Union. Today the region is made up of a number of countries seeking to find a new identity and a new place in the world.'
Please help me
"political changes have dramatically altered boundaries in Eastern Europe. For example, what was once East Germany has merged with West Germany to form Germany."
This article should help you.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastern_Europe
thankyou, it does help a lot
!
You're welcome.
To support the argument that Eastern Europe is more of a political region rather than a distinct physical region, you can consider the following points:
1. Historical Background: Eastern Europe has gone through significant political and ideological changes over the years. For most of the 20th century, the region was under the influence or control of the Soviet Union, which imposed its political, economic, and social systems. This historical context highlights the region's political nature and how it was shaped by external forces.
2. Diverse Physical Environment: Unlike Western Europe, which has relatively cohesive geographical features, Eastern Europe comprises diverse physical environments. It includes vast plains, mountains, forests, rivers, and coastlines, making it challenging to define Eastern Europe as a distinct physical region. The lack of geographical coherence reinforces the argument that its identity is primarily political in nature.
3. Shifting Borders: Eastern Europe has historically experienced frequent border changes due to political reconfigurations, conflicts, and its geopolitical position. Several countries in Eastern Europe have changed their boundaries multiple times, which underlines the significance of political dynamics in shaping the region. These border changes further support the idea that the region's identity is rooted in politics rather than fixed physical characteristics.
4. Post-Soviet Era: Since the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, Eastern European countries have been striving to redefine their political, economic, and social structures. The region has witnessed varied degrees of integration with Western institutions, such as the European Union and NATO. These political aspirations and affiliations highlight the region's focus on reshaping its political identity rather than a shared physical geography.
In conclusion, the argument is that Eastern Europe is more of a political region rather than a distinct physical one can be supported by the historical context, the diverse physical environment, the nature of border changes, and the post-Soviet era developments in the region.