What is a bogus analysis using quasi-scientific jargon, but has little or no objectivity.
Read this thread, it is brim full of all that.
http://lesswrong.com/lw/1bs/how_to_think_like_a_quantum_monadologist/16mw
If you want more, search metaphysics bogus on Google.
What is a bogus analysis using quasi-scientific jargon, but has little or no objectivity.
A bogus analysis using quasi-scientific jargon, but with little or no objectivity, refers to an evaluation or interpretation that appears to be grounded in scientific principles or language but lacks empirical evidence or impartiality. It can often be misleading or deceptive in its claims, giving the illusion of scientific legitimacy while lacking proper research methods or impartiality.
To identify such a bogus analysis, you can follow these steps:
1. Examine the language used: Look for excessive use of technical or scientific jargon without clear explanations or definitions. Authentic scientific analyses aim to communicate complex concepts in accessible terms.
2. Assess the source: Investigate the credentials and expertise of the person or organization behind the analysis. Check if they have relevant qualifications or experience in the field being discussed. Legitimate analyses are typically conducted by experts with appropriate knowledge and credentials.
3. Evaluate the evidence: Determine if the analysis presents verifiable evidence or relies primarily on conjecture, personal beliefs, or anecdotal accounts. Proper analysis relies on data, research, and reproducibility.
4. Consider bias and objectivity: Look for any indications of potential bias or vested interests. An impartial analysis should take into account multiple perspectives and consider a range of evidence without cherry-picking or distorting information to fit a preconceived agenda.
5. Seek peer review and reputable sources: Check if the analysis has undergone a rigorous review process by experts in the field. Look for insights from reputable sources, such as peer-reviewed scientific journals or recognized institutions, which have established standards of validity and objectivity.
By applying these steps, you can distinguish between a genuine scientific analysis and a bogus one that relies on quasi-scientific jargon while lacking objectivity and evidence. Remember, critical thinking and skepticism are essential when evaluating any type of analysis.