Does the War Powers Act serve to constrain or expand the President's ability to take the nation to war?
The first three sites here will be able to give you the information you need.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=War+Powers+Act+&btnG=Google+Search
Why did politics fall out of favor? Is it now back in favor?
The War Powers Act, officially known as the War Powers Resolution, was passed by the United States Congress in 1973. Its purpose is to clarify and strengthen the roles of the legislative and executive branches in decisions regarding the use of military force. Rather than expanding or constraining the President's ability to take the nation to war, the War Powers Act aims to strike a balance between the two branches.
To understand how the Act functions, we need to delve into its core provisions and the framework it establishes. The War Powers Act requires the President to consult with Congress before committing U.S. armed forces to an armed conflict, or when there is an escalating threat of hostilities. The Act sets a deadline for the President to submit a report to Congress detailing information about the deployment, including the justification for the military action.
However, the Act also recognizes the President's prerogative to initiate military action without prior congressional approval. The President can deploy forces into hostilities or situations where an armed conflict seems imminent, but needs to inform Congress within 48 hours of the action. If Congress does not authorize military action or a declaration of war within 60 days, with an additional 30-day withdrawal period, the President is then required to terminate the military involvement.
It is essential to note that the War Powers Act has been subject to interpretation and critique over the years. Presidents often assert their authority to act without congressional approval based on their powers as Commander-in-Chief. Some argue that it has restrained the President's military actions by introducing a legislative check on executive power. Others contend that it has not been effective in curbing unilateral military actions due to ambiguities in the Act and political factors.
To determine whether the War Powers Act constrains or expands the President's ability to take the nation to war, it is important to consider both the intent of the Act and its implementation in practice. Additionally, examining court cases and historical examples of military actions taken under the Act can provide insights into its impact on presidential war powers.