Compare and contrast the narrators of "Our Society at Cranford" and A Scandal in Bohemia."
We do not do your homework for you. After you have done the neede reading and writing, please repost and we will be happy to make suggestions/corrections if needed.
Please understand that no one here will do your work for you. However, we will be happy to read over whatever you come up with and make suggestions and/or corrections.
If you need help in how to write a comparison/contrast paper, these links should help:
http://leo.stcloudstate.edu/acadwrite/comparcontrast.html
http://grammar.ccc.commnet.edu/grammar/composition/comparison.htm
Please post what you think.
This is what i have so far from :Compare and contrast the narrators of "Our Society at Cranford" and A Scandal in Bohemia."
One thing that is similar about the narrators in both of these stories is that they are first person narrators
Both narrators are first person but the narrator for "Our Society" in Cranford is ironic and humorous . a The narrator for "A Scandal in Bohemia" is serious and without irony or humorousness. The reason for these differences is that in "Our Society" the narrator is telling a tale of a wickedly mischievous young lady who thinks nothing of wreaking havoc with a person's nerves. while in "A Scandal" the narrator is telling an open tale about marvelous deductive and observational skills. Just as the first requires a little ironic humor, the second requires a straightforward approach.
I need 4 sentences more.
To compare and contrast the narrators of "Our Society at Cranford" and "A Scandal in Bohemia," you will need to analyze the narrators' perspectives, styles, and roles in the stories. Here's how you can do it:
1. Read and analyze the stories: Start by reading and understanding the narratives of "Our Society at Cranford" by Elizabeth Gaskell and "A Scandal in Bohemia" by Arthur Conan Doyle. Pay attention to the details of each story and take note of how the narrators present the events and characters.
2. Identify the narrators: In "Our Society at Cranford," the narrator is an unidentified, omniscient third-person narrator who observes the events from an external perspective. In "A Scandal in Bohemia," the narrator is Dr. John Watson, who is one of the main characters in Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's Sherlock Holmes series and recounts the events from a first-person perspective.
3. Compare perspectives: Consider how the perspectives of the narrators in each story affect the reader's understanding. The unidentified narrator in "Our Society at Cranford" provides a broader view of the events and characters, while Dr. Watson's first-person perspective in "A Scandal in Bohemia" allows readers to experience the story through his eyes and emotions.
4. Analyze narrative styles: Compare the narrative styles used by the narrators. In "Our Society at Cranford," the omniscient narrator provides a detailed and observational voice, allowing readers to understand the characters' thoughts and motivations. Conversely, Dr. Watson's narrative style in "A Scandal in Bohemia" is more personal and subjective, expressing his feelings and reactions to the events.
5. Examine the narrators' roles: Consider how the narrators contribute to the overall themes and plot of their respective stories. In "Our Society at Cranford," the unidentified narrator serves as a detached observer, highlighting the quirks and social dynamics of the Cranford society. On the other hand, Dr. Watson's role in "A Scandal in Bohemia" is multifaceted, as he not only narrates the story but also serves as a loyal friend and assistant to Sherlock Holmes in solving the case.
By analyzing these aspects of the narrators in "Our Society at Cranford" and "A Scandal in Bohemia," you can effectively compare and contrast their perspectives, styles, and roles in the stories.