i need the body paragraph below edited and proofread please, i am trying to prove that empires are wrong.
Some people believe that the building of empire provides a secure natural resource due to taking over territories owned by other countries. This ultranatilsm can actual create war due to an attempt of trying to take over another country, meaning you lose resource in fighting a war. An example of how building an empire can lead to a war was, Germany attempt on taking over Europe. Nazi Germany started to build an empire in an attempt to be a world power. After Germany invaded Poland, both France and Britain declared war on Germany. Many unnecessary lives and resources were depleted on both sides of the war
Omit the first sentence. Start: Ultranationalism can actually create war . . .
Last sentence: Many lives were lost and resources were depleted on both sides.
but am supposed to talk about the arguments the other side makes and try to trash it
Some people argue that building empires can provide a secure supply of natural resources by acquiring territories from other countries. However, this justification for empire-building is flawed and can actually lead to conflicts and wars. Ultranationalism, driven by the desire to dominate and take over other nations, often results in aggression and creates tensions between countries.
When a nation attempts to expand its empire through force, it risks engaging in conflicts and wars, which can deplete valuable resources. For example, Nazi Germany's attempt to establish an empire and become a global power resulted in the outbreak of World War II. When Germany invaded Poland, France and Britain declared war on Germany in response. The war not only led to an immense loss of lives but also consumed vast amounts of resources on both sides.
In this way, the building of empires can have detrimental consequences. Instead of providing a secure supply of resources, it often leads to instability, conflict, and the wasteful expenditure of resources. Consequently, the idea that empires can ensure the availability of natural resources is flawed. Instead, it is important to seek peaceful and equitable means of resource acquisition and cooperation among nations.
Here's the edited and proofread version of the body paragraph. I have made some changes to enhance the clarity and flow of the argument:
"People often believe that empire-building provides a secure source of natural resources by acquiring territories from other countries. However, this viewpoint fails to recognize the potential negative consequences. Ultranationalism, which drives the desire for dominance, often leads to aggressive actions and triggers tensions between nations.
Attempting to expand an empire through force runs the risk of provoking conflicts and wars that deplete valuable resources. A notable example is Nazi Germany's pursuit of global power, which ultimately ignited World War II. When Germany invaded Poland, France and Britain declared war in response. This devastating conflict not only resulted in the loss of countless lives but also consumed vast amounts of resources on both sides.
Thus, the notion that empires ensure a secure supply of resources is misleading. Instead, empire-building frequently leads to instability, conflict, and the wasteful expenditure of resources. It is crucial to recognize the importance of pursuing peaceful and equitable means of resource acquisition and fostering cooperation among nations."