Why did Andrew Johnson believe that caused him to veto the Civil Rights Act of 1866?
Definitely States rights. He argued effectively, and the 14th amendment was passed to counter his arguments.
Andrew Johnson, the 17th President of the United States, vetoed the Civil Rights Act of 1866 primarily due to his strong belief in states' rights and his opposition to federal intervention in matters relating to racial equality. To understand his rationale, we can explore the historical context and examine Johnson's political views.
1. Historical Context:
- The Civil War had just ended, and the Thirteenth Amendment to the Constitution, which abolished slavery, had been ratified.
- The United States was in a phase of Reconstruction, working towards rebuilding the nation and addressing the status of newly freed slaves.
- Radical Republicans in Congress sought to secure civil rights for African Americans through federal legislation.
2. Andrew Johnson's Political Views:
- Johnson, a Southern Democrat, favored a lenient approach towards the defeated Confederate states during Reconstruction.
- He believed in states' rights, meaning he thought that individual states should have significant autonomy in governing their affairs, including matters of civil rights.
3. Reasons for Veto:
- Johnson argued that the Civil Rights Act of 1866 violated states' rights because it aimed to enforce equal rights for all citizens, including freed slaves, throughout the country.
- The act intended to protect African Americans from discriminatory laws and practices in various areas such as property ownership, contracts, and lawsuits.
- Johnson believed that such legislation was an overreach of federal power into matters primarily controlled by states. He argued that individual states should address these issues.
4. Reconstruction Conflicts:
- The veto of the Civil Rights Act of 1866 heightened the tension between President Johnson and the Radical Republicans, who sought to grant legal protections and political rights to African Americans.
- Congress subsequently overrode Johnson's veto, making the Civil Rights Act of 1866 the first major legislation passed over a presidential veto.
In summary, Andrew Johnson vetoed the Civil Rights Act of 1866 due to his staunch support for states' rights and his belief that the federal government should not interfere in matters of racial equality. Ultimately, his veto was overridden, marking an important step in securing civil rights during the Reconstruction era.
Was it racism or states' rights? What do you think?
(Broken Link Removed)