It has been said that modernization theory assumes that in backward areas modernity-inhibiting characteristics are dominant. This suggests that the effects of international factors and positive effects of traditional culture have no bearing on the lack of modernization. Defend or oppose this statement and provide justification for your decision.
Do you agree with that statement? Why?
If you post your answers, we'll be glad to help you.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modernization_theory
To evaluate and defend or oppose this statement, we need to understand the key concepts involved - modernization theory, modernity-inhibiting characteristics, international factors, positive effects of traditional culture, and lack of modernization.
Modernization theory suggests that societies evolve from traditional to modern forms as they undergo economic development. It assumes that backward areas lack certain characteristics or factors that hinder their progress towards modernization. In contrast, positive effects of traditional culture refer to the aspects of a society's culture that can contribute positively to development. International factors refer to influences from outside a country, such as economic aid, trade, or political pressure.
Now, let's examine the statement:
"The modernization theory assumes that in backward areas, modernity-inhibiting characteristics are dominant. This suggests that the effects of international factors and positive effects of traditional culture have no bearing on the lack of modernization."
Defending the statement:
One can argue that modernization theory is based on the notion that certain characteristics or factors within backward areas hinder their progress towards modernization. It assumes that these characteristics, which are seen as inhibitors of modernity, have a dominant influence on the lack of progress. From this perspective, the effects of international factors like aid or trade, as well as positive aspects of traditional culture, may be considered as having minimal or no impact on the lack of modernization.
Opposing the statement:
Alternatively, one can argue against this statement. While modernization theory claims that backward areas are characterized by modernity-inhibiting characteristics, it may oversimplify the complex factors influencing modernization. It is plausible that international factors, such as economic aid or access to global markets, can significantly contribute to modernization efforts. Additionally, positive effects of traditional culture, such as values, social cohesion, or unique knowledge systems, can play a role in development.
Justification for the decision:
The defense or opposition to the statement depends on the perspective and interpretation of the evidence. Defending the statement could be based on the assumption that backward areas possess certain characteristics or factors that impede their modernization, discounting the influence of international factors and positive effects of traditional culture. On the other hand, opposing the statement may consider a broader range of factors that can impact modernization, including the positive contributions of international factors and traditional culture.
To make a more informed decision on whether to defend or oppose the statement, it is crucial to conduct further research and examine specific case studies or empirical evidence related to modernization and development in backward areas. This approach will provide a clearer understanding of the complex dynamics involved.