which do you think would be more dangerous near an open flame, an ionic or covalent compound?
IT is a question without a right answer: it asks you what you think.
gasoline is covalent, right?
STrontium sulfide is ionic, right?
you know about gasoline. But, strontium sulfide is the stuff in fireworks that burns bright red.
Generalquestions like this have many exceptions, and I avoid them. I think your teacher is aiming for a "general" understanding that covalent compounds often have low bond energies, and the carbon in them, if present, burns with O2 to release much heat. But beware of stronium sulfide near a fire.
Most fuels are molecular (covalent) compounds as bobpursley pointed out. Ionic compounds do not burn.
Note: Some ionic materials may decompose violently or support combustion (NaNO3, KClO4, etc.)
Cesium sulfide is a stable compound that does not burn. Other flammable materials in fireworks such as magnesium provide the heat that cause the cesium in CsS to glow red.
I think my chi sister Vani's periodic table. Mila vani chi her Anitha loves the pedriodic table. Nari her right. She cannot even say it right and she proves I like it? No way kasa vani
Gosh Anitha stop! Appa said that I will learn it one day and u cannot make fun of me then. Ok stop posting those things what will everyone think?
Then u stop making fun of me. Whatever u do, it will come back to u, probably a different person will make fun of u. I can't wait for that to happen
Stop fighting. You do know that everyone can read what you guys write. Answer the question. This is not you personal battlefield.
To determine which would be more dangerous near an open flame, an ionic or covalent compound, we need to consider their respective properties and behavior in high-temperature environments.
First, let's briefly understand the difference between ionic and covalent compounds:
- Ionic compounds are formed through the transfer of electrons between atoms with opposite charges. They consist of positively charged ions (cations) and negatively charged ions (anions) held together by electrostatic forces.
- Covalent compounds, on the other hand, are formed through the sharing of electrons between atoms. They consist of molecules held together by strong bonds formed by electron sharing.
Now, when it comes to being near an open flame, there are a few factors that we need to consider:
1. Melting and Boiling Points: Ionic compounds, usually composed of metal and non-metal elements, tend to have higher melting and boiling points than covalent compounds composed of non-metals. This means that an ionic compound would require higher temperatures to melt or vaporize. Therefore, if it were close to an open flame, it wouldn't typically vaporize or react as readily as a covalent compound.
2. Volatility: Covalent compounds composed of non-metals tend to have lower melting and boiling points, making them more volatile and likely to evaporate or react with the heat of an open flame. This volatility increases the potential danger.
Taking these factors into account, covalent compounds, due to their lower melting points and volatility, would generally pose a higher risk near an open flame compared to ionic compounds.
However, it is important to note that this is a generalization, and the behavior of specific compounds can vary. Some ionic compounds may release toxic fumes or undergo unexpected reactions when exposed to high temperatures, depending on their composition. Additionally, various compounds can have different levels of flammability, stability, and reactivity when subjected to heat. Therefore, it is crucial to evaluate the properties of a specific compound to fully understand its behavior near an open flame.