When a child repeats a behavior or action simply to observe that action, you would NOT infer that, A. the child finds the behavior self-reinforcing B. the stimulation of the action is satisfying C. the stimulation provided by the action is associated with a basic drive or D the child is caught up in a simple reflex?
Let us know what YOU THINK, and someone here will be happy to comment.
To answer this question, we need to analyze the given options. The question asks us to identify the inference that would NOT be made when a child repeats a behavior or action simply to observe that action. Let's examine each option:
A. The child finds the behavior self-reinforcing: If a child repeats a behavior or action to observe it, it is reasonable to infer that the child finds the behavior self-reinforcing. This means that the child is engaged in the behavior because they find it rewarding or enjoyable. Therefore, this option does not match the question's requirement since it is a possible inference.
B. The stimulation of the action is satisfying: When a child repeats a specific behavior or action to observe it, it implies that the stimulus or stimulation resulting from that action is satisfying for the child. The child's repetition suggests that they find the stimulation pleasurable or interesting. Hence, this inference aligns with the scenario described in the question.
C. The stimulation provided by the action is associated with a basic drive: A basic drive refers to an innate or fundamental need or motivation. In this case, there is no information to suggest a direct association between the repeated behavior and a basic drive. Therefore, it would not be inferred that the stimulation provided by the action is associated with a basic drive.
D. The child is caught up in a simple reflex: Simple reflexes are instinctive responses to specific stimuli without conscious thought. However, when a child intentionally repeats a behavior or action to observe it, it indicates a deliberate and conscious choice rather than a reflex. Thus, inferring that the child is caught up in a simple reflex would not be appropriate.
Based on the analysis above, the inference that would NOT be made when a child repeats a behavior or action simply to observe that action is C) the stimulation provided by the action is associated with a basic drive.
To arrive at this conclusion, it is essential to understand the implications of each option based on the information provided and apply logical reasoning.