Whatis the historical explanation of the 7th amendment?

History in England was that lawyers and judges were tyranical in practice against common men, acting as agents to legally rob, steal from folks coming to the bench for "justice" in civil matters.And, like today, it is impossible to sue judges, and virtually impossible to sue lawyers.

So the framers added this to reign in judges in civil matters.

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080725194247AA9ISBL

true or false the new jersey plan required that each state receive the same number of seats in the federal legislature

The 7th Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees the right to a jury trial in civil cases. To understand the historical explanation of the 7th Amendment, we need to look at the context in which it was added to the Constitution.

During the Constitutional Convention in 1787, there was a debate over whether to include a right to jury trials in civil cases. The framers of the Constitution were primarily concerned with ensuring fair trials and limiting the power of the government. Several states, however, already had provisions for civil jury trials in their state constitutions, and many delegates felt it was important to protect this right at the federal level as well.

The historical explanation of the 7th Amendment stems from the desire to preserve and protect the right to a jury trial, which had been a long-standing tradition in English common law. The framers wanted to maintain this tradition as a fundamental right for American citizens, ensuring that disputes and controversies could be resolved by a jury of peers rather than being solely in the hands of judges.

Additionally, the 7th Amendment serves as a check on the powers of the judiciary. By granting the right to a jury trial, it allows for a more democratic and balanced system of justice, as a jury represents a cross-section of the community and provides a diversity of perspectives.

In summary, the historical explanation of the 7th Amendment lies in the framers' desire to preserve the right to a jury trial in civil cases, as well as to provide a safeguard against an overly powerful judiciary.