Can you please explain to me what this means. This is what I think that it means. Jackson did not agree with states having any right to nullify a federal law. An ordiance was passed by the people of South Carolina because they felt that the Tariffs of 1828 and 1832 were unconsitutional. Any additional explaining about this would be great.

President Andrew Jackson issued a proclamation to the people of South Carolina that disputed a states right to nullify a federal law. Jackson's proclamation was written in response to an ordiance issued by a South Carolina convetion that declared that the tariff acts of 1828 and 1832 are unauthorized by the consitution of the US and violate the true meaning and intent thereof and are null, void, and no law, nor binding upon the state. Led by John C. Calhoun, the nullifers felt that the tariff acts of 1828 and 1832 favored Northern manufacturing interests at the expense of Southern famers.

You have it correct in the second paragraph.

I know but I found that on the Internet. How would I sum it up for school to share with the class?

Jackson meant that the states didn't have the power to change or ignore federal laws.

The statement you provided explains a historical event involving President Andrew Jackson and the state of South Carolina in the 19th century. To fully understand the context and meaning of the statement, let's break it down:

1. "Jackson did not agree with states having any right to nullify a federal law":
This refers to President Andrew Jackson's disagreement with the concept of states having the power to declare federal laws null and void within their own territories. Jackson believed in a strong central government and the supremacy of federal laws over state laws.

2. "An ordinance was passed by the people of South Carolina because they felt that the Tariffs of 1828 and 1832 were unconstitutional":
The people of South Carolina passed an ordinance, a law or decree with legal authority, in response to their belief that the Tariffs of 1828 and 1832 violated the United States Constitution. These tariffs imposed taxes on imported goods, which some South Carolinians felt disproportionately favored Northern manufacturing interests over Southern agricultural interests.

3. "President Andrew Jackson issued a proclamation to the people of South Carolina":
In response to South Carolina's ordinance, President Andrew Jackson issued a proclamation addressing the dispute. A proclamation is an official public announcement or statement made by a government authority.

4. "Jackson's proclamation was written in response to an ordinance issued by a South Carolina convention":
The ordinance mentioned earlier was issued through a convention held in South Carolina. A convention refers to a gathering of representatives or delegates who come together to discuss and make decisions on specific matters.

5. "The ordinance declared that the tariff acts of 1828 and 1832 are unauthorized by the Constitution and are null, void, and no law, nor binding upon the state":
The South Carolina ordinance stated that the Tariffs of 1828 and 1832 were unauthorized by the United States Constitution and therefore considered null and void. They believed that these tariff acts had no legal power and were not binding on South Carolina.

6. "Led by John C. Calhoun, the nullifiers felt that the tariff acts favored Northern manufacturing interests at the expense of Southern farmers":
John C. Calhoun, a prominent politician from South Carolina, was a key figure in the nullification movement. The nullifiers believed that the tariff acts were unfairly biased towards Northern manufacturing interests and detrimental to Southern farmers.

In summary, the statement describes the disagreement between President Andrew Jackson, who opposed states' power to nullify federal laws, and the state of South Carolina, which declared the Tariffs of 1828 and 1832 unconstitutional. Led by John C. Calhoun, South Carolina's nullifiers held the belief that these tariffs harmed Southern agricultural interests. President Jackson issued a proclamation in response to the South Carolina convention's ordinance, asserting the authority of the federal government and rejecting the state's nullification of the tariff acts.