What would be some supporting ideas to the statement the north didn't so much win the civil war as the south lost the civil war?
Here are a number of sites that may be of help.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=+the+north+didn%27t+so+much+win+the+civil+war+as+the+south+lost&btnG=Search
To come up with supporting ideas for the statement "the North didn't so much win the Civil War as the South lost the Civil War," you can consider several key factors that led to the South's defeat. Here are some supporting ideas:
1. Economic Factors: The North had a stronger industrial base than the South, which allowed for efficient production of weapons, ammunition, and other military supplies. The South, on the other hand, heavily relied on its agrarian economy, lacking the industrial capacity to sustain a prolonged war effort.
To elaborate on this point, you can mention how the North's industrial advantage contributed to their ability to produce war materials, expand railroads for troop and supply movements, and finance the war effort through a more stable financial system.
2. Naval Blockade: The Union Navy effectively established a blockade of Southern ports, which severely hindered the South's ability to import crucial supplies and export cash crops such as cotton. This blockade significantly impacted the South's economy by limiting its access to much-needed resources, causing shortages, and making it harder for the Confederate government to sustain its war effort.
You can provide examples of how the Union Navy's control of key waterways, particularly the Mississippi River, split the Confederacy in half, cutting off crucial supply lines and isolating important Southern regions.
3. Population and Resources: The North had a larger population and a more extensive pool of resources compared to the South. This advantage enabled the North to raise larger armies, maintain a robust industrial output, and sustain a prolonged war effort.
To elaborate, you can highlight how the North's larger population translated into a larger pool of potential soldiers, which allowed them to field larger armies and replace losses more easily. Additionally, the North's greater access to natural resources, such as coal and iron, provided a significant advantage in terms of industrial production.
4. Military Leadership: The North had capable military leaders like Ulysses S. Grant and William Tecumseh Sherman, who developed effective strategies and tactics to wear down the Confederate forces. In contrast, the South struggled to find consistently effective leadership throughout the war, facing a series of leadership changes and divisions among its commanders.
You can emphasize how the Union leadership's ability to coordinate large-scale military operations paved the way for key victories, such as the capture of important Confederate strongholds like Vicksburg and Atlanta.
5. Political and Diplomatic Challenges: The Confederate government faced challenges in maintaining international recognition and support. The North successfully worked to prevent European powers, particularly Britain and France, from formally recognizing the Confederacy. This lack of foreign recognition limited the South's diplomatic and economic efforts to secure vital supplies and support.
To elaborate, you can mention instances where the North's diplomatic efforts and the Emancipation Proclamation's declaration against slavery influenced foreign powers to maintain a neutral stance or side with the Union.
Remember, these supporting ideas are just a starting point, and you can expand on them by providing specific examples, historical evidence, and additional insights as you delve further into the topic.