I need help with these two question.And if you can help me understand them as well.thanks
1)Did the U.s. governmnet fostered monopoly or oligopoly ownership throughout radio's history.
2)What are some advantages and disadvantages of government-fostered ownership?
Let's first look at the definitions from dictionary.com.
ol·i·gop·o·ly /ˌɒlɪˈgɒpəli/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[ol-i-gop-uh-lee] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun the market condition that exists when there are few sellers, as a result of which they can greatly influence price and other market factors. Compare duopoly, monopoly (def. 1).
mo·nop·o·ly /məˈnɒpəli/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[muh-nop-uh-lee] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun, plural -lies. 1. exclusive control of a commodity or service in a particular market, or a control that makes possible the manipulation of prices. Compare duopoly, oligopoly.
What do you think? Has the government encouraged only one company to control all radio stations? Or has it encouraged several companies to own them?
What do you think the advantages and disadvantages would be if the government owned all of the radio stations?
If you post your answers, we'll be glad to critique them for you.
See i posted the required assingment in another post. But i am having trouble with it.
My opinion is that I think that the government has many compies for many different radio stations depending on who promotes them.
If the government only owned all radio stations then basically all stations would be similar. So the advantage would be just one company would have all profits and disadvantages would be that there could be many stations but all similar.
The U.S. government hasn't had much control over radio stations for over 50 years.
Your answers are correct. We could also add that if only one or a few companies owned all of the radio stations, then our freedom of speech could be severely curtailed.
Can you help me set up the paper like an outline so i do not loose myself on what to talk about like help me organize it. THANKS
tHE ACTUAL ASSINGMENT IS IN A PREVIOUS LINK
Looking now . . .
thank you.
Who was the the first woman in space,from where?
1) To answer the question about whether the U.S. government fostered monopoly or oligopoly ownership throughout radio's history, you can follow these steps:
a) Understand the terms: Monopoly refers to a situation where a single company controls a particular market or industry. Oligopoly, on the other hand, occurs when a few dominant firms dominate an industry.
b) Research the history of radio in the U.S.: Start by looking into the development of radio broadcasting in the U.S., including major milestones, key players, and regulatory frameworks. This research will provide insights into the various stages of radio's history and how ownership structures evolved over time.
c) Analyze government regulations and policies: Examine the role of the U.S. government in regulating radio broadcasting. Look for instances where government policies favored a monopoly or oligopoly ownership. Consider key legislations, the establishment of licensing systems, and regulatory bodies such as the Federal Communications Commission (FCC).
d) Evaluate ownership patterns: Study the ownership patterns of radio stations throughout history. Identify any trends or instances where monopoly or oligopoly ownership was fostered by government actions or policies.
e) Synthesize the information: Based on your research and analysis, form your conclusion on whether the U.S. government fostered monopoly or oligopoly ownership throughout radio's history.
2) Exploring the advantages and disadvantages of government-fostered ownership involves considering different perspectives and relying on research. To understand this topic, follow these steps:
a) Define government-fostered ownership: This refers to situations where the government actively promotes or supports the ownership of certain industries or sectors.
b) Identify advantages: Research and compile a list of potential advantages associated with government-fostered ownership. Some common advantages could include promoting competition, ensuring public interest is prioritized, regulating prices, ensuring fair access, and promoting stability in strategic sectors or industries.
c) Identify disadvantages: Conduct further research to identify potential disadvantages associated with government-fostered ownership. These might include the risk of reducing innovation, limiting market choices, potential corruption or inefficiency, crowding out private investment, and reducing market flexibility.
d) Consider case studies: Look for real-life examples where government-fostered ownership has been implemented and study the outcomes. Analyzing case studies will provide more context and further insights into the advantages and disadvantages of government intervention in ownership.
e) Acknowledge opposing viewpoints: Recognize that opinions on government-fostered ownership can vary, with some supporting intervention for specific reasons and others opposing it. Consider multiple perspectives and evidence to form a comprehensive understanding of the topic.
Remember, conducting thorough research and seeking a balanced understanding will help you answer these questions more effectively.