how did Roosevelt,Taft and Wilson differ as architects of American imperialism

To understand the differences between Roosevelt, Taft, and Wilson as architects of American imperialism, we need to assess their individual approaches and foreign policies during their respective presidencies. Here's how you can analyze their differences:

1. Research the Roosevelt Corollary: Theodore Roosevelt believed in an assertive approach to American imperialism. He implemented the Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine, which stated that the U.S. had the right to intervene in Latin American countries to maintain stability and protect American economic interests. Look for examples of Roosevelt's interventionist policies in the Caribbean and Central America.

2. Investigate Taft's Dollar Diplomacy: William Taft, on the other hand, opted for a more economic-centered foreign policy known as Dollar Diplomacy. He aimed to expand American influence by using economic investments and loans to other nations, particularly in Latin America and Asia. Look for instances of Taft's economic interventions in countries like China, Nicaragua, and Honduras.

3. Analyze Wilson's Moral Diplomacy: Woodrow Wilson had a different approach that focused on promoting democracy and human rights. He advocated for what he called "moral diplomacy," which meant supporting nations that shared America's values and ideals. To understand Wilson's imperialism, research his interventions in Mexico, Haiti, and the Dominican Republic, highlighting his reasoning and justifications for involvement.

By looking into these policies and their applications, you can gain a comprehensive understanding of how Roosevelt, Taft, and Wilson differed as architects of American imperialism.