Is president Obama's plan for health care reform socialism or common sense " mixed economy" approach in the economic and political mainstream of America? How would Adam Smith have used the free market to solve our health care problem? What other models exist for the united states to copy from?

Yours is a loaded and open-ended question. Ask yourself should access to health care be an basic human right, and therefore government has an obligation to provide care to people who cannot afford it.

repost with your own answer. I or others will be glad to critique.

Determining whether President Obama's plan for health care reform is socialism or a "mixed economy" approach is a subjective matter and can vary depending on one's political beliefs and interpretation. However, we can discuss the general concepts and provide guidance on how to analyze the situation.

To assess Obama's plan, you can start by researching and understanding the principles of socialism and a mixed economy. Socialism typically involves government ownership or control over the means of production and distribution, while a mixed economy combines elements of both free markets and government intervention.

To evaluate Obama's plan as either socialism or a mixed economy approach, examine the extent of government control, intervention, and regulation proposed, as well as the involvement of private entities within the plan. Consider whether these elements align more with socialist ideas or a mix of government and market influences.

Regarding Adam Smith and the use of the free market to solve America's health care problem, it's essential to note that Adam Smith, an influential economist, lived during the 18th century and did not specifically address health care. He advocated for the free market as a mechanism for economic growth and prosperity. However, applying his ideas to health care can be challenging due to its unique characteristics and complexities.

One approach derived from Adam Smith's ideas is to allow competition and market forces to play a role in the health care sector. This could involve reducing government regulations, promoting transparency in pricing, encouraging consumer choice, and facilitating competition among health care providers and insurers. The idea is that a competitive market would drive efficiency, innovation, and affordability.

As for other models that the United States could consider, various countries have different health care systems to analyze and learn from. Some common models include:

1. Single-Payer System: This approach, seen in countries like Canada or the United Kingdom, involves the government being the sole provider of health care, funded through taxes.

2. Multi-Payer System: Many European countries, such as Germany or Switzerland, have a multi-payer system where both public and private insurers coexist, often mandated by law. The government may regulate the market and provide subsidies to ensure universal coverage.

3. Hybrid Models: Some countries, like Australia or the Netherlands, have a mix of public and private health care elements. These models often have universal coverage alongside private insurers and providers.

To explore these models further, research their pros, cons, and outcomes compared to the United States' current system. It's important to bear in mind that any model implemented should be tailored to the unique circumstances and cultural context of the United States.