When first looking at the raw data without controlling for case characteristics, RAND found that large race effects with the decision to seek the death penalty are more likely to occur when the defendants are white and when the victims are white. However, these disparities disappeared in each of the three studies when the heinousness of the crimes was taken into account. The RAND study concludes that the findings support the view that decisions to seek the death penalty are driven by characteristics of crimes rather than by race. RAND's findings are very compelling because three independent research teams, using the same data but different methodologies, reached the same conclusions.


Question
what are the premises, and the conclusion of this argument

Question

what are the premises, and the conclusion of this argument

Please let us know what YOU THINK, and someone here will be happy to comment.

Premises:

1. When initially analyzing the raw data without controlling for case characteristics, RAND found that race effects were more likely to occur when the defendants and victims were both white.
2. These disparities disappeared when the heinousness of the crimes was taken into account.

Conclusion:
The findings of the RAND study support the view that decisions to seek the death penalty are driven by characteristics of crimes rather than by race.

Premise 1 states the initial findings of the study, indicating that race effects were observed when no control was applied. Premise 2 explains that these disparities disappeared when the heinousness of the crimes was considered. Based on these premises, the conclusion is drawn that the decisions to seek the death penalty are influenced by crime characteristics rather than race.