I read this short story and I understand it pretty much but there are some things Im confused about.

Were all the people in Cell 5 murdered by machine gun fire?
Did Perucho Rodi escape from Cell 4 and avoid getting caught as one of the people involved?
Was Perucho Rodi the one who shot his fellow companions with the machine gun?

To answer your questions about the short story, it's important to understand that the information provided might not be explicitly stated in the text. Sometimes, literary works leave certain details open to interpretation, allowing the reader to draw their own conclusions. In cases like these, it can be helpful to analyze the text for clues and make inferences based on the information at hand.

To determine whether all the people in Cell 5 were murdered by machine gun fire, you should go back to the text and look for any evidence that supports or contradicts this idea. Pay attention to any explicit descriptions, dialogue, or indirect references that might shed light on the fate of the characters. If the story doesn't provide a definitive answer, you can consider the author's intention and the overall theme of the story to make an educated guess.

Regarding Perucho Rodi, look for any information that suggests whether he escaped from Cell 4 and avoided being caught. Scrutinize the actions, thoughts, or dialogue of the characters to see if there are any hints or clues about Perucho's whereabouts and involvement. Again, if the story is ambiguous on this point, consider the author's purpose and the narrative's overall message to make an inference.

Similarly, to determine if Perucho Rodi was the one who shot his companions with the machine gun, carefully examine the available evidence in the story. Look for any character descriptions, dialogue, or snippets of information that might point to Perucho's involvement or offer insight into the events. Additionally, consider the character's motives, personality traits, or any other contextual details that might suggest their capacity for such actions.

Remember, in analyzing a literary work, it's not always about finding concrete answers but rather exploring the text and forming your own interpretation based on the available evidence.