''Without the English civil war, democracy would have never developed.'' No one would have been able to asert changes at all. No one would have been able to make their own decisions/rights. Everything would have happened accordingly by king, and the king would have made decisions regarding his own life. He would only do things for his own benefit. With the occurance of this English war, people have the right to judge.

is this good? Oh and Ms. Sue I don't really like my ending where it ends with judge, can you please help me change that ending, thanks

How about?

. . . people now have the right to make their own decisions

yes, thanks you so much Ms. Sue you are the best:-)

Ms. Sue do think this is good?

Yes. It's good. You've corrected the run-on sentences. :-)

thank you Ms. Sue you are number 1 and will always be for me:-)

The statement you have made suggests that without the English Civil War, democracy would not have developed, and people would not have had the ability to assert changes or make their own decisions and rights. The power would have been solely in the hands of the king, who would have made decisions based solely on his own benefit. However, with the occurrence of this war, people now have the right to judge.

Regarding your request to change the ending, I can help you come up with alternative options. Here are a few suggestions:

1. ... people now have the right to express their own opinions and shape the course of their lives.
2. ... people now have the freedom to determine their own paths and influence the society they live in.
3. ... people now possess the power to advocate for their rights and demand a more equitable society.

Feel free to choose the option that best suits your writing style and message.