plz check. thanks

Compare and contrast the short and long- term effects of the Crusades on Western Europe and the Middle East.

Western Europe: The series of military expeditions, spanning more than a hundred years, began with Pope Urban II to take back the Holy Land from Muslim control. Land was only given to older sons; the crusaders also provided the opportunity for younger sons to gain new lands. By eleventh century Muslim leader had control over the holy lands. First crusades. Resulted in the capture of Jerusalem and the establishment of the four Crusader kingdoms. Due to the exposure of the Muslim world they brought back discoveries of many goods that they could only import before.

Middle East: In the eleventh century, Muslim leaders were in control of many cities that was considered sacred fro Christians. A campaign against the Muslim began to form in both Western Europe and Byzantine Empire. The Islamic world in the Middle East continued to thrive despite the crusaders unsuccessful attempt to take land permanently and the Crusades had very little long term effect on Muslim territory. The Crusaders brought back paper and sugar, and thy learned how to make to make many of the goods they previously could only import. Muslims also made enormous intellectual contributions to Europe in two ways: Arabic translation of works by ancient Greek scientists and philosophers. Second, Arabs and Iranians building on the work of the ancient philosophers had added their own insights to give rise to new and innovative ideas.

You have some good ideas there. However, some of the information in the second paragraph belong in the first. Also, be sure to proofread carefully. You've left out a few words and a few words should be plural.

It often helps to let your writing sit overnight and then read it again. Having someone read it slowly out loud to you will also help you catch your mistakes.

this answer is rong af!!!!!!

The short-term effects of the Crusades on Western Europe and the Middle East can be compared and contrasted as follows:

Western Europe:
1. Economic Effects: The Crusades brought back discoveries and goods from the Muslim world that were previously difficult to import, stimulating trade and economic growth in Western Europe.
2. Social Effects: The Crusades provided opportunities for younger sons of nobility to gain new lands and wealth, as land was typically inherited by the older sons. This led to the establishment of new Crusader kingdoms in the Holy Land.
3. Political Effects: The capture of Jerusalem and the establishment of the Crusader kingdoms had a significant impact on the political dynamics of Western Europe, as it increased the power and influence of feudal lords who participated in the Crusades.

Middle East:
1. Economic Effects: The Crusaders brought back goods such as paper and sugar, which were previously unavailable in Western Europe. However, the long-term economic impact on the Middle East was limited, as the Crusaders' attempts to establish permanent control over the land were unsuccessful.
2. Social Effects: The Crusades had a minimal long-term impact on the social structure of the Middle East, as the Muslim leaders remained in control of the sacred cities and the overall social fabric of the region continued to thrive.
3. Intellectual Effects: The Crusades indirectly contributed to intellectual advancements in Europe through the translation of works by ancient Greek scientists and philosophers, which were brought back from the Muslim world. However, the Middle East had already made significant intellectual contributions by translating and building upon the works of ancient philosophers.

To get a more comprehensive understanding of the effects of the Crusades on Western Europe and the Middle East, it is recommended to read historical accounts and scholarly research articles on this topic. These sources will provide more detailed information and different perspectives on the subject.