identify at least two arguments in the article.Outline the premises and the conlusions of each argument you find. then, answer the questions for each argument, making sure to explain how you arrived at your answer.
Article?? What article?
What arguments did YOU find?
Do you really think we can help you with this assignment with nothing to go on????
You must have posted this assignment in the wrong forum.
Controlling irrational fears after 9-11
We don't have access to this article. It's in your Axia Appendix. Please note that we have no connection to Axia or any other school.
If you'd like to copy and paste the article here -- and tell us your answers -- then we'll try to help you.
To identify arguments in an article, it's necessary to analyze the author's main points, premises, and conclusions. The premises are the supporting statements that lead to the conclusion, which is the author's main point or claim. Here is an example of how to identify two arguments and their premises/conclusions.
Argument 1:
Premise 1: Vaccines have been proven to be safe and effective in preventing diseases.
Premise 2: The COVID-19 vaccine has gone through extensive clinical trials and regulatory processes.
Conclusion: Therefore, getting vaccinated against COVID-19 is a safe and effective choice.
Question: Is the argument deductive or inductive?
Answer: This argument appears to be inductive. The premises provide evidence to support the conclusion, but they do not guarantee the truth of the conclusion. The premises suggest a high probability, but not certainty, that getting vaccinated against COVID-19 is safe and effective.
Explanation: The deductive argument would have included premises that necessarily lead to the conclusion. For example, if the premises stated that "all vaccines are safe and effective," and "the COVID-19 vaccine is a vaccine," then the conclusion would be deductive. However, in the given argument, the premises provide evidence rather than an absolute guarantee, making it an inductive argument.
Argument 2:
Premise 1: COVID-19 has caused significant global health and economic impacts.
Premise 2: Implementing strict preventive measures can help control the spread of the virus.
Conclusion: Therefore, it is essential to follow recommended guidelines, such as wearing masks and practicing social distancing.
Question: Is the argument valid or invalid?
Answer: This argument is valid.
Explanation: To determine if an argument is valid, we need to evaluate if the premises logically support the conclusion. In this case, the premises state that COVID-19 has had global impacts and that implementing preventive measures can help control the spread. These premises logically support the conclusion that it is essential to follow recommended guidelines. The conclusion follows logically from the premises, making the argument valid.
Remember, when evaluating an argument, it's important to assess the logical relationship between the premises and the conclusion to determine if it is deductive or inductive, and whether it is valid or invalid.