Sorry! this is alot of questions. Science is not my best subject but i still do well in it but the questions are really hard for me pleas help answer this.
What might you ask yourself in drawing a conclusion about an experiment?
Why is scientific inquiry a process with many paths, not a rigid siquence of steps?
In scientific inquiry, what is communicating?
please answer this if you know the answer or you are a science teacher.
Please no websites to the answer.
Thank You!!
1) you might ask yourself, was my hypothesis correct, does my data seem reliable, was the experiment data reflect the law or theory proposed.
I am really confused about science . I love working with microscopes and I love looking at the cells but the thing is .... I don't get the organelles !! I can't find any similar jobs that they do . Ya know . all the cells have different jobs to do ! Any ideas ?
I JUST DID THIS RIGHT NOW FOR HOMEWORK =)
1. did i get enough data?
2.observations at each stage of the process may lead you to modify your hypothesis or experiment.
3.the sharing of ideas and expiremental findings with others through writing and speaking.
that is what i got from the science book . =)
what is an acrostic peom for ivestigate
1)Was my hypothesis right
2)is my data right
3)what steps did i do?
4)how did i get them
No problem! I'm here to help you with your questions.
1. What might you ask yourself in drawing a conclusion about an experiment?
When drawing a conclusion about an experiment, you should ask yourself the following questions:
- Did the results support or reject the hypothesis?
- Were there any unexpected results or patterns observed?
- Were there any errors or limitations in the experimental design?
- Is there enough data to draw a valid conclusion?
- Are there any alternative explanations for the results?
By asking these questions, you can critically evaluate the experiment and determine the significance of the results.
2. Why is scientific inquiry a process with many paths, not a rigid sequence of steps?
Scientific inquiry is not a rigid sequence of steps because the process of scientific investigation is flexible and iterative. It involves continually asking questions, designing experiments or studies, collecting data, analyzing results, and drawing conclusions. Science is constantly evolving, and new discoveries can lead to changes in the way experiments are designed or how data is interpreted. There are often different approaches or methods to investigate a scientific question, and scientists may take different paths based on their expertise and available resources. This flexibility allows for creativity and innovation in scientific research.
3. In scientific inquiry, what is communicating?
In scientific inquiry, communicating refers to the process of sharing research findings, methods, and ideas with others in the scientific community and the general public. Scientists communicate through various channels, such as scientific journals, conferences, academic presentations, and collaborations. They publish their results, which undergo peer review to ensure accuracy and validity. Effective communication is essential to disseminate knowledge, seek feedback, and build upon existing research. It facilitates the exchange of ideas, fosters collaboration, and helps in advancing scientific understanding.
I hope this helps! If you have any further questions or need more clarification, feel free to ask.