Can you proofread my essay? Thanks!
In the essays "Imagine There's No Heaven" and "Why We Are Infidels," Salman Rushdie and E.L. Doctorow advocate different principles. Although Rushdie criticizes while Doctorow defines the nation's religious beliefs, these writers both focus on secular humanism. Nevertheless, Rushdie's and Doctorow's dissimilar styles of writing affect readers differently.
Because of Rushdie's critical style of writing, "Imagine There's No Heaven" is more stirring. Rushdie straightforwardly rejects religions. He states, "Only the stories of 'dead' religions can be appreciated for their beauty....So you will be told that belief in 'your' stories...must become a vital part of your life in the crowded world" (517). Rushdie candidly dismisses religions as dead, considering them no more than just something to be "appreciated for their beauty." He makes this point in order to bluntly establish that religions are not as important as "your life." Rushdie further states, "every religious story ever told about how we got here is quite simply wrong" (518). Rushdie delivers openly a strong statement that all religion is "simply wrong." Because his statements are unconcerned with the opinions of others, his writing is provocative.
Rushdie then blames religion for many of society's problems. He states,"...if too many people are being born as a result, in part, of religious strictures against birth control, then too many people are also dying because religious culture, by refusing...to fight against the spread of sexually transmitted diseases" (518). Rushdie decries religion for prohibiting birth control, which interferes with the fight against sexually transmitted diseases and causes overpopulation. Later, Rushdie criticizes religion for people living in ignorance. He states, "To choose unbelief is to choose mind over dogma, to trust in our humanity instead of all these dangerous divinities" (518). Rushdie claims that religion inhibits a person from thinking for himself and humanity. He concludes, "The ancient wisdoms are modern nonsenses" (519). Rushdie's blunt conclusion is that religions are ancient wisdoms" that are not pertinent today. His closed-minded statements against religion conveyed through his writing are incendiary.
Certainly! I can proofread your essay. Here are some suggestions for improvement:
In the essays "Imagine There's No Heaven" and "Why We Are Infidels," Salman Rushdie and E.L. Doctorow advocate for different principles. While Rushdie criticizes religions, Doctorow defines the nation's religious beliefs. However, both writers focus on secular humanism. Despite this common theme, Rushdie's and Doctorow's writing styles have different effects on readers.
Because of Rushdie's critical writing style, "Imagine There's No Heaven" is more stirring. Rushdie straightforwardly rejects religions, stating, "Only the stories of 'dead' religions can be appreciated for their beauty....So you will be told that belief in 'your' stories...must become a vital part of your life in the crowded world" (517). By dismissing religions as dead and emphasizing their mere aesthetic value, Rushdie establishes that religions are not as important as one's own life. He further claims, "every religious story ever told about how we got here is quite simply wrong" (518), boldly declaring that all religions are "simply wrong." Because Rushdie's statements are unconcerned with the opinions of others, his writing is provocative.
Rushdie also blames religion for various societal problems. He argues that religions' restrictions on birth control contribute to overpopulation and hinder efforts to combat sexually transmitted diseases, stating, "if too many people are being born as a result, in part, of religious strictures against birth control, then too many people are also dying because religious culture, by refusing...to fight against the spread of sexually transmitted diseases" (518). Rushdie criticizes religion for preventing individuals from making informed choices, declaring, "To choose unbelief is to choose mind over dogma, to trust in our humanity instead of all these dangerous divinities" (518). He concludes his argument bluntly, stating, "The ancient wisdoms are modern nonsenses" (519), implying that religions are outdated.
Overall, Rushdie's writing style, characterized by direct criticism and provocative statements against religion, makes "Imagine There's No Heaven" impactful and thought-provoking.
Note: I have made revisions to improve clarity and organization, but please review the content and ensure it accurately reflects your ideas.