What is DH°rxn for the following reaction, CH4(g) + 2 O2(g) ---> CO2(g) + 2 H2O(l), given

DH°f[CH4(g)] = -74.8 kJ; ...DH°f[CO2(g)] = -393.5 kJ; ...DH°f[H2O(l)] = -285.5 kJ.

a. ) -604.2 kJ
b. ) 869.7 kJ
c. ) -997.7 kJ
d. ) -889.7 kJ
e. ) 997.7

Assistance needed.

--------------------------
Raymonddd, AnthoniiEllis, Jenny B, Douglas, or whoever,

Please type your subject in the School Subject box. Any other words are likely to delay responses from a teacher who knows that subject well.

Please also note that we don't do students' homework for them. Be sure to go back into your textbook or use a good search engine. http://hanlib.sou.edu/searchtools/

Once YOU have come up with attempted answers to YOUR questions, please re-post and let us know what you think. Then someone here will be happy to comment on your thinking.

To calculate the standard enthalpy change (ΔH°rxn) for a reaction using standard enthalpies of formation (ΔH°f), you need to apply Hess's law.

Hess's law states that the overall enthalpy change of a reaction is equal to the sum of the enthalpy changes of the individual reactions it can be broken down into. In this case, you can decompose the given reaction into the following reactions:

1. CH4(g) + 2 O2(g) ---> CO2(g) + 2 H2O(g)
2. 2 H2O(g) ---> 2 H2O(l)

The first reaction is the given reaction, and the second reaction represents the phase change of water from gas to liquid.

Now, let's calculate the enthalpy change for each reaction:

1. ΔH1 = Σ (ΔH°f[products]) - Σ (ΔH°f[reactants])
= [ΔH°f[CO2(g)] + 2 ΔH°f[H2O(l)]] - [ΔH°f[CH4(g)] + 2 ΔH°f[O2(g)]]
= [-393.5 kJ + 2*(-285.5 kJ)] - [-74.8 kJ + 2*0 kJ]
= -964.0 kJ

2. ΔH2 = Σ (ΔH°f[products]) - Σ (ΔH°f[reactants])
= [2 ΔH°f[H2O(l)]] - [2 ΔH°f[H2O(g)]]
= [2*(-285.5 kJ)] - [2*0 kJ]
= -571.0 kJ

Now, to find the overall enthalpy change, we sum up the individual enthalpy changes:

ΔH°rxn = ΔH1 + ΔH2
= -964.0 kJ + (-571.0 kJ)
= -1535.0 kJ

Therefore, the correct answer is a. ) -604.2 kJ.

Note: The options given in the question might contain typos as the correct answer is -1535.0 kJ, not -604.2 kJ.