If all the assumptions of perfect competition hold, why would firms in such an industry have little incentive to carry out technological change or much research and development? What conditions would encourage research and development in competitive industries?
What do you think?
We'll be glad to comment on your answers.
This site may help you.
http://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/perfectcompetition.asp
In a perfectly competitive market, there are several assumptions, including a large number of buyers and sellers, homogeneous products, perfect information, and free market entry and exit. Under these assumptions, firms have little incentive to carry out technological change or invest in research and development (R&D) for a few reasons.
Firstly, in a perfectly competitive market, firms are price takers. This means they have no control over the market price and must accept the prevailing price determined by the forces of supply and demand. Since price is determined solely based on the interaction of market forces, firms have no ability to charge a higher price for their products, even if they invest in R&D and develop improved technologies. This lack of price control means that firms cannot directly benefit from technological advancements through higher prices or increased market share.
Secondly, in a perfectly competitive market, there is no product differentiation. All products in the market are considered identical, and consumers have no preference for one product over another. As a result, firms have no incentive to invest in R&D to develop differentiated products that can command a higher price or capture a larger market share. The absence of product differentiation eliminates the potential for firms to gain a competitive advantage through technological innovation.
However, there are conditions that can encourage research and development in competitive industries. These conditions can potentially disrupt the perfect competition assumptions and create opportunities for firms to invest in R&D. Some of these conditions include:
1. Technological advancements: If a firm introduces a new technology that significantly improves production processes or product quality, it may be able to differentiate itself in the market and gain a competitive advantage. This advantage can potentially allow the firm to command higher prices or capture a larger market share, providing incentives for R&D.
2. Intellectual property protection: Strong intellectual property rights, such as patents, can provide firms with exclusive rights to their innovations for a limited period. This protection allows firms to recoup their R&D investments by preventing competitors from copying or replicating their technology. With the assurance of exclusive rights, firms are more likely to invest in R&D.
3. Market power: If a firm becomes dominant in a market, either through mergers, acquisitions, or organic growth, it may have the market power to influence prices and differentiate its product. This market power can create incentives for firms to invest in R&D to maintain their market position or expand their dominance.
4. Externalities: Positive externalities, such as knowledge spillovers, can encourage R&D in competitive industries. Knowledge spillovers occur when the innovations or knowledge developed by one firm benefit other firms in the industry. This shared knowledge can lower the costs or risks associated with R&D, making it more attractive for firms to invest in innovation.
In summary, firms in perfectly competitive industries have little incentive to carry out technological change or invest in R&D due to the lack of price control and product differentiation. However, certain conditions, such as technological advancements, intellectual property protection, market power, and positive externalities, can encourage firms to invest in R&D in competitive industries.