Reliability in Chemistry

How can I determine if my results are reliable?

I measured the voltage produced across different cells made of four different metals. I then took measurements and recorded them in a table, but was told that my results are not considered reliable.

What constitutes reliability of data collected during any experiment? How can I judge if the data collected was reliable for any experiment I come across?

Thanks a lot. Any help is appreciated.

Reliability is the correlation of actual values with the supposed real value. Generally reliability analysis is performed with scores not experimentally derived values. In real-world research arrival at a “real” reliable vale is reached by several independent investigators use the same and also alternative routes to obtain that value.

It may be possible that your values are far a field from true voltages. How many times did your take the voltage measurements? However, taking simple voltage readings generally yields consistent results. Then there is the issue of the preparation of the cells themselves. To obtain more “reliable” data, one would make up cells from scratch and obtained voltage values. These would be averaged to come to some values closer to the real ones. One would also look at standard deviations to see if the data distribution is overly broad.


Reliable is not a term used in scientific work. Scientitists focus on repeatability, and verifiability. The entire focus on the scientific process is to have data that can be repeated, and verified. So you do this by making multiple observations, with different instruments. And, have others repeat your measurements.
One never knows if a value is reliable, whatever that means, but one does get through confirmation and repeat measurements some validity to the process.


Thank you for using the Jiskha Homework Help Forum. Although this is definitely NOT my area, let's begin with a definition of the word "reliability."

Main Entry: re·li·abil·i·ty
Pronunciation: ri-"lI-&-'bi-l&-tE
Function: noun
Date: 1816
1 : the quality or state of being reliable
2 : the extent to which an experiment, test, or measuring procedure yields the same results on repeated trials

Now, as BobPursley mentioned, "repeated" tests, giving the same result in successive experiments would be considered "dependable" or "reliable." Therefore the measurements you put on your table should be consistent. Perhaps you only did one test per metal? Perhaps your teacher will "clarify" why your results were not "reliable."

  1. 👍 0
  2. 👎 0
  3. 👁 83

Respond to this Question

First Name

Your Response

Similar Questions

  1. Math

    Danielle wants to determine the median age of the 300 people attending a music festival. She selects 3 people at random and determines the median. What may be concluded about the results? A. The results are a good predictor of the

    asked by MarieNeko on March 12, 2019
  2. psychology

    In order to be useful, a test must be reliable. In other words, it must: A. produce the same results from one time to the next. B. predict other criteria of the trait being measured. C. measure what it is designed to measure. D.

    asked by elly on June 19, 2015
  3. psychology

    : In order to be useful,a test must be reliable. I nother words, it must: A.) produce the same results from one time to the next B.) predict other criteria of the trait being measured C.) measure what it is designed to measure D.)

    asked by Pateyn on January 4, 2012
  4. psychology

    In order to be useful, a test must be reliable. In other words, it must : performance. a. produce the same results from one time to the next b.predict other criteria of the trait being measured c, measure what it is designed to

    asked by kaye on April 30, 2013
  5. college chemistry

    the Cu(No3)2 solution was diluted to 0.001 M. The voltage was measured against standard zinc electrode and found to be 0.89 volts.. 1. write the cell reaction. 2. write the line notation for the reaction. 3. Use the nernst

    asked by Anonymous on May 19, 2015
  6. Chemistry

    the equation of the line for a graph of voltage versus log[Cu2+] was y= - 0.0179x - 0.0015. The voltage of a solution with an unknown [Cu2+] was measured against the same reference cell, under the same conditions; the voltage was

    asked by Daniel on June 14, 2011
  7. Chemistry

    The equation of the line for a graph of voltage versus log[Cu2+] was y= - 0.0179x - 0.0015. The voltage of a solution with an unknown [Cu2+] was measured against the same reference cell, under the same conditions; the voltage was

    asked by Max on June 15, 2011
  8. chemistry

    I need assistance with this question please. "The equation of the line for a graph of voltage (Ecell) versus log[Cu2+] was y= -0.0166x - 0.0082. The voltage of a solution with an unknown [Cu2+] was measured against the same

    asked by upthecreek on March 15, 2011
  9. science

    why might using the speed of light to determine the length of the meter be more reliable than using a measured distance around the earth

    asked by syd on August 15, 2019
  10. Thank You MathMate

    Thank you for assisting me with my MATLAB question. If I posted this on the actual question you never would of seen it. What you suggested to do worked and produced the results I was suppose to get. I wanted to say thank you. And

    asked by Lee on July 19, 2011

More Similar Questions