We are doing a debate on dress codes in my class. I am on the Affirmitave team (for dress codes) and I am the first speaker, so I say a short, planned speech. I heard from some people that I am supposed to have a "hook" or "grabber" at the beginning to be convincing. But others have told me that I should simply state my name and my group's side, then get more into the facts. Which is the correct way? Thank you so much! :)
well you could do a little of both by saying a catchy sentence and then stating more of the facts
Thanks... :-) I'm just not sure what the correct way is.
the correct way is doing a hook in order to captivate the audience attention.
Any presentation should, if possible, start with a grabber or hook.
One thought -- that might not work out or meet your teacher's approval -- is to dress as outrageously as possible. Hopefully you'll get a laugh from your audience. Ask if this is how kids in your school should dress? That part shouldn't go on for more than a few seconds. Then, straighten your clothes, pull your shirt down, or cover it up, put on a wrap-around skirt, or whatever it takes to cover up and look decent.
Continue with your speech.
Thanks for the suggestion, that is a great idea! The thing is, we have to "dress up" so we look professional, so I do not think that would work. Thank you, though!
Both approaches can be effective in a debate, and the choice ultimately depends on your personal preference and speaking style. Let's break down each approach to help you make an informed decision:
1. Using a hook/grabber: Starting your speech with a hook can engage the audience's attention and make your arguments more persuasive. A hook can be a thought-provoking question, a striking statistic, an insightful quote, or a compelling anecdote related to dress codes. This approach aims to capture the audience's interest and set the tone for your argument.
Example: "Imagine this scenario: a student walks into a school wearing clothing that is considered 'inappropriate' according to dress codes. They're pulled aside, shamed, and told to change, all in the name of enforcing rules. But what if dress codes weren't just about regulations? What if they were about empowering students? That's the vision our affirmative team stands for."
2. Clear introduction: Alternatively, you can begin your speech by clearly stating your name, the side you're representing, and briefly outlining your team's key stance on dress codes. This approach focuses on succinctly presenting your position and setting clear expectations for your speech.
Example: "Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. My name is [Your Name], and I am the first speaker for the affirmative team. Today, we stand in support of dress codes, arguing that they serve a valuable purpose in promoting professionalism, safety, and equality within schools."
Both approaches have their merits. Ultimately, it depends on how you want to structure your argument and connect with your audience. Remember, the most important thing is to deliver your points with confidence and provide credible evidence to support your position. Good luck with your debate!