I am doing a essay on the Jon Ritter case for a class and am having trouble finding impact of the legal issue in this case as it was settled out of court and no doctors where changed with the misdiagnosis of this case so can any one please help me out here.
If the case was settled out of court and no charges were filed, what legal issue are you trying to write about?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You may have to search and research, but once you learn some good sources and methods, you should have success. In addition to searching on the Internet, you also need to make best friends with the reference librarian(s) in your local or college library. Libraries these days subscribe to enormous research databases, and they are often more useful than Internet searches. Ask your librarian if you have access to EBSCOHost -- it has several databases within it, including at least three for health sciences, one for military and government, one huge one for academic research, and others.
For Internet searching:
http://hanlib.sou.edu/searchtools/
At this webpage, you can go immediately to the search sites (first three columns across the top) -- or even better you can scroll down until you see the section called HOW TO SEARCH THE INTERNET. Those are the links to start with. You'll not only learn how to come up with good search terms, but also how to evaluate the webpages you get as results. Some will be good and others will be garbage. You need to know how to tell the difference.
My favorite way to search is to go to Google's advanced search page http://www.google.com/advanced_search?hl=en and put my search words or phrases into the first or second search box (either "all the words" or "exact phrase"). Another is to start out at http://scholar.google.com. However, there many other strategies for searching you can use, and the HOW TO SEARCH THE INTERNET section will help you best.
Learning to use Google or other search engines can save you time and help you learn to find information efficiently. Here are some websites that can teach you how:
http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/TeachingLib/Guides/Internet/FindInfo.html
http://hanlib.sou.edu/searchtools/searchtips.html
http://www.pandia.com/goalgetter/index.html
http://websearch.about.com/mbody.htm?once=true&COB=home&PM=112_100_T
... and one to help you judge whether a particular website's information is worth your time:
http://hanlib.sou.edu/searchtools/evaluate.html
wow thank you so much for all this information. I will begin to search these things now.
You're very welcome. And don't forget to take advantage of library databases. They're exceptional.
Certainly! In order to understand the impact of the legal issue in the Jon Ritter case, even though it was settled out of court and no doctors were charged with misdiagnosis, we can consider several factors:
1. Public Awareness: The Jon Ritter case received significant media attention, which raised public awareness about the issue of misdiagnosis. This case highlighted the potential risks and consequences associated with medical errors, leading to increased public scrutiny and demand for improvements in healthcare practices.
2. Medical Guidelines: Following the case, medical institutions and organizations may have revisited their guidelines and protocols for diagnosing and treating similar conditions. The potential backlash and negative publicity surrounding the case might have motivated medical professionals to review their diagnostic procedures and ensure they are adhering to the highest standards of care.
3. Patient Advocacy: The case may have given rise to increased patient advocacy for better communication and transparency in healthcare. Patients and their families may have been inspired to assert their rights to accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment. This could have led to an increased emphasis on informed consent and open communication between patients, healthcare providers, and institutions.
4. Legal Precedent: Although the case was settled out of court, it may have established some legal precedents or influenced the development of medical malpractice laws and regulations. Legal decisions and settlements can contribute to shaping future legal frameworks and procedures, potentially leading to changes in how such cases are handled in the future.
5. Research and Education: The Jon Ritter case could have triggered further research into the area of misdiagnosis, leading to new insights, studies, and educational initiatives. Medical professionals might now be more aware of the dangers and challenges associated with accurate diagnosis, leading to improved training and continuing education on the subject.
To further explore these impacts, you can look for scholarly articles, medical journals, news reports, and legal analyses related to the Jon Ritter case. Additionally, you may find it beneficial to examine similar cases or broader discussions on misdiagnosis and its consequences in the medical field.