If there was global peace wouldn't everyone be following the same religion? So wouldn't that be a negative factor of global peace because no one religion can unify people it can only divide.
The question you're asking involves a complex and open-ended discussion about religion and its role in achieving global peace. While it is true that differing religious beliefs have historically been a source of conflict, it does not necessarily follow that global peace requires everyone following the same religion.
Global peace refers to a state in which nations, communities, and individuals coexist peacefully, with minimal conflict, violence, and disruption. Achieving global peace involves addressing multiple factors such as social, economic, political, and cultural aspects, not just religious beliefs.
It is important to recognize the value of diversity and respect for different religious and cultural traditions. Instead of focusing on a single religion, global peace is more likely to be fostered by promoting tolerance, understanding, and interfaith dialogue. These efforts encourage people to appreciate and learn from one another's beliefs, bridging differences rather than seeking to homogenize them.
Building a peaceful world requires addressing root causes of conflict, such as poverty, inequality, lack of education, and political instability. By addressing these underlying issues, we can create conditions that foster harmony among diverse religious and non-religious groups.
In summary, while a singular religion might provide a sense of unity to some extent, true global peace is more likely to be achieved through tolerance, understanding, and acceptance of different beliefs, while also addressing broader societal challenges.