Ho can program evaluation can improve a program, consider both the manager and funder perspectives
What do you mean? Your statement is incoherent.
How can program evaluation improve a program, but consider the manager and the funders perspective
Check these sites.
http://managementhelp.org/evaluatn/fnl_eval.htm
http://extension.psu.edu/evaluation/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Program_evaluation
Program evaluation can play a crucial role in improving a program from both the manager and funder perspectives. It provides a systematic way to assess the effectiveness, efficiency, and relevance of a program, leading to informed decision-making and potential areas of improvement. Let's discuss how program evaluation can benefit both managers and funders:
1. Manager's perspective:
- Assessing Program Effectiveness: Program evaluation helps managers determine how well their program is achieving its intended goals and objectives. By collecting and analyzing data, evaluation can provide insights into the impact and outcomes of the program. This information allows managers to identify successful strategies or areas that need improvement.
- Identifying Program Gaps and Barriers: Evaluation can identify gaps or barriers that hinder the program's progress. This could include logistical challenges, resource constraints, or implementation issues that need to be addressed for better program delivery.
- Facilitating Decision-Making: Evaluation results provide evidence-based information to support decision-making. Managers can use evaluation findings to allocate resources effectively, refine program strategies, enhance program components, or even consider program expansion or discontinuation based on the results.
2. Funder's perspective:
- Accountability and Evidence-Based Funding: Funders have the responsibility to ensure that their investments are being used effectively. Program evaluation provides an objective assessment of program outcomes and helps funders understand whether their investment is producing the desired impact. It helps demonstrate accountability to stakeholders and justifies continued funding.
- Learning and Improvement: Evaluation provides funders with valuable knowledge about the program's strengths, weaknesses, and areas for improvement. This information can be used to guide future funding decisions, refine funding strategies, and support evidence-based investments in similar programs.
- Program Scaling: Evaluation findings can guide funders in identifying successful programs and scaling up their impact. By understanding the key factors contributing to a program's success, funders can replicate and support the expansion of effective interventions in other settings.
In order to conduct program evaluation, managers and funders can follow these steps:
1. Clearly define program goals and objectives.
2. Identify relevant evaluation questions and indicators to measure progress.
3. Collect and analyze data using appropriate evaluation methods (e.g., surveys, interviews, observations).
4. Interpret and synthesize evaluation findings to get a comprehensive picture of the program's performance.
5. Provide actionable recommendations for program improvement based on evaluation results.
6. Continuously monitor and evaluate the program to ensure ongoing effectiveness.
By engaging in a robust evaluation process, both managers and funders can gain valuable insights and make informed decisions to improve the program's impact and sustainability.